Jim Palmer wrote:Recently I acquired several older cylinder locks without keys at an antiques store for practice purposes. Several opened readily without much effort. But a few proved especially stubborn, especially the Corbin-Russwins. I'm wondering if the disparity might result from the fact that several of the locks appeared to have been removed from the doors with a crowbar. Could this have damaged the pins? I tried a little powdered graphite, but this didn't help too much. Are these older locks much different from the ones being manufactured now? Picking them feels similar. A couple of them are larger, as if they were designed for a school or office building. When I say old I'm thinking most of these locks were from about 1940-1960. Any suggestions welcomed.
If they are the Corbin "Jumbo" cylinders which use the Master Ring Cylinder principle, they are in fact more difficult to pick. Not impossible mind you, but they will be harder than a 1950's Segal rim cylinder, etc.
good pics can be found here:
http://ericschmiedl.com/locks/index4.html
got any pics? I'd like to compare to the ones in my collection.
Squelchtone