by crusaderman » 9 Aug 2014 8:09
You're correct, the owner of the flat (in this case) wasn't locked out, but the flat was on the first floor and the only way to reach the other side of the door was by a ladder! Last year I had a similar problem and managed to wreck the gearing in the central mechanism by applying too much downward force on the handle! And so I was a bit reluctant to repeat this method.
I was also aware that if I snapped the existing lock to remove it there was no guarantee I could get the door open and this might leave the owner of the flat with just a hole where the lock had been. (If you recall from my first post, the cylinder appeared to be operating the latch. I could tell from the resistance that the latch / bolt was moving back and forth with the key).
By the way, the flat owner wasn't the person who called me! It was the boss of a decorating firm whose needed access to paint the outside safety railings. So he had to get permission from his client who owned the block of flats to employ me!
In many cases I give the customer an assessment of the job as I go along so that they know possible outcome (if I think there could be a problem), but as the guy in the flat wasn't responsible for paying me, I reported it back to "Boss", and when I said I couldn't guarantee opening the door, he told me to leave it!
I guess a general lack of experience and confidence to complete the job was my undoing. I don't believe in charging when a job isn't completed, so in this instant I had to take a "fall".