by Feryll » 28 Aug 2021 16:16
As far as I understand it, the only reason that the most common method for cracking Master-like dial padlocks is allowed to work is because of the unique wavy shape of the cam nearest the dial—it enables one to very reliably deduce the third digit of the combination. I know that rigorous security isn't exactly a priority for the Master Lock company, but wouldn't it actually be cheaper and more secure to use three identically machined cams? I assume that there has to be some sort of pragmatic engineering reason for sticking with the starfish cam...