Information about locks themselves. Questions, tips and lock diagram information should be posted here.
by Squelchtone » 28 Aug 2019 7:20
[EDIT: Photo posted to imgur.com by OP, original post updated] Your sharing permissions are not set up, we have to ask for Permission to view your photos. Please consider hosting photos anywhere else but in a google drive, it requires all of us to have a google login in order to see your photos. imgur.com seems to work well, upload photos as Private, paste direct link here. The [img] command only displays photos with a direct url to the image file such as http://www.domainname.com/foldername/filename.jpgThank you Squelchtone
-

Squelchtone
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 11307
- Joined: 11 May 2006 0:41
- Location: right behind you.
by jwrm22 » 28 Aug 2019 10:08
Thank you for sharing this lock with us. I'm amazed and am looking forward to reading the article/ patent documentation. Don't attempt to make a lock to beat a lockpicker. It's a lot harder to make something cheap, reliable and serviceable. When a hobby picker picks it it does not mean it's a bad lock.
How well do you know disk detainer locks? They use a toolhead that fits in between the discs. But I see how this is something completely different.
-
jwrm22
-
- Posts: 137
- Joined: 26 Sep 2017 12:27
by Squelchtone » 28 Aug 2019 10:57
How does the key insert? It appears like you have to turn the key to navigate the opening in the disks in correlation to the shape of the key. It reminds me of the Fichet F3D key. 
-

Squelchtone
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 11307
- Joined: 11 May 2006 0:41
- Location: right behind you.
by Yehonatan Knoll » 28 Aug 2019 11:36
Squelchtone wrote:How does the key insert? It appears like you have to turn the key to navigate the opening in the disks in correlation to the shape of the key.
Watch the attached clip (10 sec.) or the patent. The wafers are initially centered.
-
Yehonatan Knoll
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: 28 Aug 2019 5:43
by Raymond » 28 Aug 2019 20:26
This is a very interesting design. However, I also am wondering what keeps the wafers straight and in line so the key can enter. It would seem that any picking attempt or just vibration would cause the wafers to slide about and not be in line.
Nothing is foolproof to a talented fool. Wisdom is not just in determining how to do something, but also includes determining whether it should be done at all.
-
Raymond
-
- Posts: 1357
- Joined: 18 Jan 2004 23:34
- Location: Far West Texas
by Yehonatan Knoll » 29 Aug 2019 2:03
Raymond wrote:I am wondering what keeps the wafers straight and in line so the key can enter. It would seem that any picking attempt or just vibration would cause the wafers to slide about and not be in line.
You are right in principle (although the wafers are spring loaded). This drawback, however, is common to all disc detainer locks so I concluded that it's not a real practical problem. Note also that the wafers can easily be centered with any tooth pick. I have also thought of a way to lock the wafers in place while the key is outside, but that would slightly complicate the mechanism.
-
Yehonatan Knoll
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: 28 Aug 2019 5:43
by jbrint » 29 Aug 2019 21:45
My biggest concern is the key itself. That looks like something that will get broken in a pocket or twist off
-

jbrint
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: 7 Aug 2015 22:27
- Location: Houston, Texas
by Yehonatan Knoll » 30 Aug 2019 2:05
jbrint wrote:My biggest concern is the key itself. That looks like something that will get broken in a pocket or twist off
There are ways to make it stronger (see patent) but even as is, its geometry is stronger than some commercial, deeply cut keys (Abloy Classic for example).
-
Yehonatan Knoll
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: 28 Aug 2019 5:43
by mh » 4 Jul 2021 8:31
Hi Yehonatan, Sorry I missed this post until now (and found it because of Zeefeene's presentation). Anyway - would I be able to move a somewhat flexible spring steel wire with a "v"-shaped bend at the tip through the wafers? Like ---------------------v ? Cheers mh
"The techs discovered that German locks were particularly difficult" - Robert Wallace, H. Keith Melton w. Henry R. Schlesinger, Spycraft: The secret history of the CIA's spytechs from communism to Al-Qaeda (New York: Dutton, 2008), p. 210
-
mh
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 2437
- Joined: 3 Mar 2006 4:32
- Location: Germany
-
by Yehonatan Knoll » 19 Sep 2021 3:11
Hello mh - my old friend  Wasn't notified of your reply... Anyway, I'm not sure what your tool is intended for. Zeefeene seems to have missed the point of the concept. With some good glue, tensioning is not really an issue in my lock, or any other lock. The idea is that, after setting some wafers, access is denied for the rest. I explain it in detail in the patent.
-
Yehonatan Knoll
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: 28 Aug 2019 5:43
by mh » 19 Sep 2021 4:29
I think that tool would be more suitable for picking than the L-shaped tool “P1” in your provisional patent.
Best Michael
"The techs discovered that German locks were particularly difficult" - Robert Wallace, H. Keith Melton w. Henry R. Schlesinger, Spycraft: The secret history of the CIA's spytechs from communism to Al-Qaeda (New York: Dutton, 2008), p. 210
-
mh
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 2437
- Joined: 3 Mar 2006 4:32
- Location: Germany
-
by Yehonatan Knoll » 19 Sep 2021 5:40
mh- Perhaps V, or asymmetric T tips could be beneficial in some cases (but not others). But I think there is an inherent limitation to torque-and-set: The wire needs to be extremely flexible, yet transfer moment to its shaped tip. And it will inevitably interact also with multiple wafers beside the one engaging its tip.
-
Yehonatan Knoll
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: 28 Aug 2019 5:43
by mh » 19 Sep 2021 6:21
That is correct, but if you achieve the desired front-to-back binding order, the other wafers should be held in place (in their gates) by the sidebar.
"The techs discovered that German locks were particularly difficult" - Robert Wallace, H. Keith Melton w. Henry R. Schlesinger, Spycraft: The secret history of the CIA's spytechs from communism to Al-Qaeda (New York: Dutton, 2008), p. 210
-
mh
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 2437
- Joined: 3 Mar 2006 4:32
- Location: Germany
-
by Yehonatan Knoll » 19 Sep 2021 6:51
Yes, you are right that knowing in advance the binding order could potentially benefit a picker, though I'm still skeptical that enough. And there is no problem producing, say, 10 types of sidebars each distinctly biased to produce "statistical" front-to-back binding order.
-
Yehonatan Knoll
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: 28 Aug 2019 5:43
Return to Locks
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests
|