vap0r wrote:
Anyone who thinks UL 437 is 'high security' doesn't know much about security. For example, many of the locks that are UL 437 certified can be easily bumped open.
Lot of High Security locks can be compromised easily, by bumping or by other simple techniques including by-pass for example. They still are High Security locks.
So saying that UL437 is High Security seems coherent (Actually, I don't know UL437, it doesn't exist in France), but High Security means that the lock is protected against some attacks, not that it is effectively immune.
Otherwise, we could not have the pleasure to open High Security locks if the are considrered low-security since we can open them without the key
Just my two cents
