Lock Picking 101 Forum
A community dedicated to the fun and ethical hobby of lock picking.
       

Lock Picking 101 Home
Login
Profile
Members
Forum Rules
Frequent Forum Questions
SEARCH
View New Posts
View Active Topics


Live Chat on Discord
LP101 Forum Chat
Keypicking Forum Chat
Reddit r/lockpicking Chat



Learn How to Pick Locks
FAQs & General Questions
Got Beginner Questions?
Pick-Fu [Intermediate Level]


Ask a Locksmith
This Old Lock
This Old Safe
What Lock Should I Buy?



Hardware
Locks
Lock Patents
Lock Picks
Lock Bumping
Lock Impressioning
Lock Pick Guns, Snappers
European Locks & Picks
The Machine Shop
The Open Source Lock
Handcuffs


Member Spotlight
Member Introductions
Member Lock Collections
Member Social Media


Off Topic
General Chatter
Other Puzzles


Locksmith Business Info
Training & Licensing
Running a Business
Keyways & Key Blanks
Key Machines
Master Keyed Systems
Closers and Crash Bars
Life Safety Compliance
Electronic Locks & Access
Locksmith Supplies
Locksmith Lounge


Buy Sell Trade
Buy - Sell - Trade
It came from Ebay!


Advanced Topics
Membership Information
Special Access Required:
High Security Locks
Vending Locks
Advanced Lock Pick Tools
Bypass Techniques
Safes & Safe Locks
Automotive Entry & Tools
Advanced Buy/Sell/Trade


Locksport Groups
Locksport Local
Chapter President's Office
Locksport Board Room
 

Faultless locks

Information about locks themselves. Questions, tips and lock diagram information should be posted here.

Faultless locks

Postby Heliox » 4 Apr 2005 13:27

I've obtained access to a few faultless locks and i've notices some oddnesses while trying to repin them.

1) The entire lock seems to be made of low grade aluminum. Aluminum is extremely reactive with oxygen and cannot hold a low friction polish making these locks operate in an extremely non-smooth manner.

2) the top/bottom pins are totally square. they do not appear to be beveled at all at the shear line and the bottom pins are totally square on both ends and only VERY slightly radiused (likely from wear) where they hit the key.

3) the springs are more tightly wound with a smaller diameter at the ends but expand to fill the hole in the middle. Odd that the springs would have a design that someone actually had to think about but the rest of the locks seem to be total crap. The springs also emerge from their holes more than necessary so that without a follower, repinning is much more trouble than it should be. This also puts more pressure on the pins than most other locks that I've tried.

Combining these issues, the lock has an extremely unpleasant feel as though the mating surfaces are coated with sandpaper. I think it may be the crappiest lock i've ever played with (and there have been many). Does anyone have any additional insight into the operation and construction of these locks?

I haven't spent much time picking it because it's so unpleasant, but I'd be interested to hear if there might actually be legitimate reasons for the design.
Heliox
 
Posts: 59
Joined: 22 Mar 2005 20:38

Postby vector40 » 4 Apr 2005 15:46

That seems to be the look of most springs I've run into.
vector40
 
Posts: 2335
Joined: 7 Feb 2005 3:12
Location: Santa Cruz, CA

Postby omelet » 4 Apr 2005 16:13

faultless must be the brand name then....

maybe these locks are designed to discourage picking, not through security measures, but just by making the picker lose his mind.
omelet
 
Posts: 216
Joined: 30 Jan 2005 5:39
Location: Youngstown, Ohio

Postby skold » 6 Apr 2005 8:08

No lock is faultless, get it into your head, leave it there.
Image
skold
 
Posts: 2250
Joined: 24 Feb 2004 3:59
Location: Australia

Postby digital_blue » 6 Apr 2005 10:17

I believe this is what he is referring to...

http://www.faultlesslock.com/

db
Image
digital_blue
Admin Emeritus
 
Posts: 9974
Joined: 6 Jan 2005 15:16
Location: Manitoba


Return to Locks

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests