Lock Picking 101 Forum
A community dedicated to the fun and ethical hobby of lock picking.
       

Lock Picking 101 Home
Login
Profile
Members
Forum Rules
Frequent Forum Questions
SEARCH
View New Posts
View Active Topics


Live Chat on Discord
LP101 Forum Chat
Keypicking Forum Chat
Reddit r/lockpicking Chat



Learn How to Pick Locks
FAQs & General Questions
Got Beginner Questions?
Pick-Fu [Intermediate Level]


Ask a Locksmith
This Old Lock
This Old Safe
What Lock Should I Buy?



Hardware
Locks
Lock Patents
Lock Picks
Lock Bumping
Lock Impressioning
Lock Pick Guns, Snappers
European Locks & Picks
The Machine Shop
The Open Source Lock
Handcuffs


Member Spotlight
Member Introductions
Member Lock Collections
Member Social Media


Off Topic
General Chatter
Other Puzzles


Locksmith Business Info
Training & Licensing
Running a Business
Keyways & Key Blanks
Key Machines
Master Keyed Systems
Closers and Crash Bars
Life Safety Compliance
Electronic Locks & Access
Locksmith Supplies
Locksmith Lounge


Buy Sell Trade
Buy - Sell - Trade
It came from Ebay!


Advanced Topics
Membership Information
Special Access Required:
High Security Locks
Vending Locks
Advanced Lock Pick Tools
Bypass Techniques
Safes & Safe Locks
Automotive Entry & Tools
Advanced Buy/Sell/Trade


Locksport Groups
Locksport Local
Chapter President's Office
Locksport Board Room
 

Idea? Making a lock tougher to pick.

Information about locks themselves. Questions, tips and lock diagram information should be posted here.

Idea? Making a lock tougher to pick.

Postby digital_blue » 10 Oct 2005 14:07

So, I was pondering this today and I can't see any reason why this idea wouldn't make a lock significantly harder to pick. Assume for the example that we are using a standard basic deadbolt cylinder such as a Weiser or Kwikset.

If one of the pin stacks was intentionally loaded with a top pin of a smaller diameter than the rest of the pins, and a bottom pin with a larger diameter. Assume this was done in chamber 5 (though it wouldn't matter). The way I see it, pin stack 5 would be the last to bind because of the smaller diameter on the top pin. So after setting each of the other pin stacks, you would get a more significant turn of the plug much like when you have a spool pin. But when trying to set the stack, due to the larger diameter of the bottom pin, you would end up resetting the regular pins.

This would offer no protection against bumping or pick guns etc, but it seems to me it would be at least as effective as a spool pin. Perhaps even more if the pin diameter of the larger bottom pin were sufficiently large enough.

I could be missing something here, but... any thoughts?

db
Image
digital_blue
Admin Emeritus
 
Posts: 9974
Joined: 6 Jan 2005 15:16
Location: Manitoba

Postby stick » 10 Oct 2005 14:11

Why would the larger diamater of the bottom pin affect the other pin stacks? When the top of the bottom pin is pushed to the shear line, the top pin would set, and the lock would open. There's no reason to raise the bottom pin above the shearline, and therefore no reason the other pins would unset.
stick
 
Posts: 617
Joined: 31 Mar 2004 23:55

Postby digital_blue » 10 Oct 2005 14:15

LOL. :oops:

Wow. Of course. How silly.

You know, I got myself into a bit of a mental trap because of a lock I've been working on recently. Hehehehe... ok, seemed like a good idea at the time. :P

Thanks stick.

db
Image
digital_blue
Admin Emeritus
 
Posts: 9974
Joined: 6 Jan 2005 15:16
Location: Manitoba

Postby stick » 10 Oct 2005 14:29

Haha, yeah, happens all the time to me. You get on this track where you think you've got this brilliant idea because you've overlooked one simple thing.
stick
 
Posts: 617
Joined: 31 Mar 2004 23:55

Postby treboR » 10 Oct 2005 14:47

I have a generic kw1 deadbolt that is quite hard to pick. The top of the entire number 4 pin stack sits at the shearline. I can't set it first because it does not bind until after I set the 3rd stack. After I set the 3rd stack it turns so far that I can not lift it at all. Because of this the number 5 stack is very hard to set. This is my second hardest lock behind my biaxial. I can pick it, but it is difficult. BTW. it does not have any security pins.

It bumps pretty easily, and I can open it with my electric pick.
treboR
 
Posts: 245
Joined: 17 Aug 2005 1:43

Postby stick » 10 Oct 2005 14:55

Yeah, a while back, I bought a Kwikset deadbolt that had the best pinning I've ever seen on a Kwikset. It's virtually unpickable without a graduated curve pick, and even then I had to make a special one for that lock where it gets steeper towards the end.
stick
 
Posts: 617
Joined: 31 Mar 2004 23:55

Postby digital_blue » 10 Oct 2005 15:11

Aha! But what about a conical shaped top pin? I know conical pins exist, but is that the point? That the bottom of the cone is of a larger diameter than the other pins? 'Cause if it is, that seems like it would be a more effective form of security pin. If it's not, then maybe it should be.

Or am I just missing something again?

db
Image
digital_blue
Admin Emeritus
 
Posts: 9974
Joined: 6 Jan 2005 15:16
Location: Manitoba

Postby stick » 10 Oct 2005 15:48

Again, it'd be the same as picking a spool or mushroom pin. Even if it does cause the other pins to unset, after it's set, the other pins would be able to be set normally.
stick
 
Posts: 617
Joined: 31 Mar 2004 23:55

Postby digital_blue » 10 Oct 2005 16:08

You're absolutely right. Ok. I give up then. :lol: :lol:

db
Image
digital_blue
Admin Emeritus
 
Posts: 9974
Joined: 6 Jan 2005 15:16
Location: Manitoba

Postby Mad Mick » 10 Oct 2005 16:42

How about:
spool, mushroom, serrated, mushroom fitted up-side down, standard pin?

Or shall I go join db in the corner? :wink:
Image If it ain't broke.....pull it down and see how it works anyway!
Mad Mick
 
Posts: 2314
Joined: 8 Jan 2004 19:19
Location: UK

Postby digital_blue » 10 Oct 2005 16:46

Please do. It's lonely here.

LP

db
Image
digital_blue
Admin Emeritus
 
Posts: 9974
Joined: 6 Jan 2005 15:16
Location: Manitoba

Postby stick » 10 Oct 2005 16:55

In theory, no matter what shapes and sizes the pins are, it'd be possible to pick, unless at their widest points, each pin was exactly the same size, the holes were perfectly lined up, etc, IE perfect tolerances. In practice, I doubt you could pick a Kwikset pinned with those. :wink: Also could try replacing the standard pin with one of those spools with the sliding sleeve.
stick
 
Posts: 617
Joined: 31 Mar 2004 23:55

Postby Mad Mick » 10 Oct 2005 17:21

stick wrote:...sliding sleeve.

Stupid pins. :evil:
Image If it ain't broke.....pull it down and see how it works anyway!
Mad Mick
 
Posts: 2314
Joined: 8 Jan 2004 19:19
Location: UK

Postby jamesphilhulk2 » 10 Oct 2005 17:41

what about a modified Time Lock?
jamesphilhulk2
 
Posts: 528
Joined: 5 Jul 2005 4:37
Location: S.Wales, uk

Postby TOWCH » 10 Oct 2005 23:58

What about an SFIC using this alternating between small top, and small bottom pins. If you can make an SFIC with pin stacks that alternate which stack they like to set at it would make picking frustrating.
TOWCH
 
Posts: 1587
Joined: 20 Jul 2004 0:19
Location: Oregon

Next

Return to Locks

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

cron