Secure x 3

by **Chrispy** » 21 Oct 2005 4:47

Ha! Bit of overkill don't you think? :lol:

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/MOST-SECURE-DOOR-triple-barrel-LOCK-GIVE-A-WAY_W0QQitemZ6007454656QQcategoryZ78864QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

by **skold** » 21 Oct 2005 5:23

Omg.. whay are people so stupid :lol:

by **Dimmy Locks** » 21 Oct 2005 5:30

lol, I so hope u dont have to turn all 3 at same time, whilst holding a baby and carrying the shopping in a thunderstorm.

Nice lock, on a nice door, nice fence. wire cutters anyone? <g>

by **Varjeal** » 21 Oct 2005 16:23

One of more secure Door locking mechanism on the Market we offer now for a friction of retail price.Come complete ---lock insert,dead lock+3keys,3-barrel lock+unic(they you can`t copy)with 8 keys,S.steel Door handle,all screws,and frame backing plate.VERY STYLISH.Insurance Co.basic requirement for a contest Insurance.We have for a right or left opening entrance doors.BE IN IT TO WIN IT no reserve price.

Friction of retail price, huh. What does that mean, exactly? ....and what comes complete? The lock? ...and who can't copy, they or you?...8 Keys????? ...and what moronic insurance company can demand a lock that requires three keys to get in???? ...and what exactly do I have to be in to win it?

Good grief I get sick of reading stuff that people don't take the time to format properly.... :roll:

by **Mad Mick** » 21 Oct 2005 18:37

they you can`t copy

Soooo, who can then?

by **wraith** » 8 Nov 2005 2:41

And I thought the customers that want a keyed deadbolt on the inside AND the outside were a little slow...

Trey

by **Chrispy** » 8 Nov 2005 4:11

Keyed both sides deadbolts are sometimes required by insurance companies. The theory is, if someone breaks into your house through a window or other means, they can't walk out your front door with large items, restricting what the thief can steal. If you don't have keyed both sides deadbolts, they might not cover you as much as if you did.

by **mike-z** » 8 Nov 2005 18:29

:o how do you open that without droping the milk?

by **zeke79** » 8 Nov 2005 19:16

Chrispy wrote:Keyed both sides deadbolts are sometimes required by insurance companies. The theory is, if someone breaks into your house through a window or other means, they can't walk out your front door with large items, restricting what the thief can steal. If you don't have keyed both sides deadbolts, they might not cover you as much as if you did.

In some areas that is against life/safety codes.

by **Chrispy** » 8 Nov 2005 23:44

In Australia, if you live in a shared dwelling (apartment/unit) it is illegal to have deadbolts on your door, period. If you live in a house, it's fine.

by **digital_blue** » 9 Nov 2005 0:39

Chrispy wrote:In Australia, if you live in a shared dwelling (apartment/unit) it is illegal to have deadbolts on your door, period. If you live in a house, it's fine.

... no really ...

:shock:

by **Chrispy** » 9 Nov 2005 4:58

Seriously. Basically, you can't put anything on your door that would prevent the door from closing and latching properly. This includes a chain. :shock:

Basically, if you live in an apartment or a unit, the only thing you can have on your door is a deadlatch.

The door viewer has to be fire-rated as well.

by **devnill** » 17 Nov 2005 21:50

hey, through a 'criminals are dumb ' approach this may be a good idea. Not only is there no know to snap off, the complexity added by a second lock makes it appear more secure. I probbally would make a bad burgular, but if i was, i would just move on to the next house if i didnt use NDE(and i wouldnt)

Secure x 3

Secure x 3

Who is online