Lock Picking 101 Forum
A community dedicated to the fun and ethical hobby of lock picking.
       

Lock Picking 101 Home
Login
Profile
Members
Forum Rules
Frequent Forum Questions
SEARCH
View New Posts
View Active Topics


Live Chat on Discord
LP101 Forum Chat
Keypicking Forum Chat
Reddit r/lockpicking Chat



Learn How to Pick Locks
FAQs & General Questions
Got Beginner Questions?
Pick-Fu [Intermediate Level]


Ask a Locksmith
This Old Lock
This Old Safe
What Lock Should I Buy?



Hardware
Locks
Lock Patents
Lock Picks
Lock Bumping
Lock Impressioning
Lock Pick Guns, Snappers
European Locks & Picks
The Machine Shop
The Open Source Lock
Handcuffs


Member Spotlight
Member Introductions
Member Lock Collections
Member Social Media


Off Topic
General Chatter
Other Puzzles


Locksmith Business Info
Training & Licensing
Running a Business
Keyways & Key Blanks
Key Machines
Master Keyed Systems
Closers and Crash Bars
Life Safety Compliance
Electronic Locks & Access
Locksmith Supplies
Locksmith Lounge


Buy Sell Trade
Buy - Sell - Trade
It came from Ebay!


Advanced Topics
Membership Information
Special Access Required:
High Security Locks
Vending Locks
Advanced Lock Pick Tools
Bypass Techniques
Safes & Safe Locks
Automotive Entry & Tools
Advanced Buy/Sell/Trade


Locksport Groups
Locksport Local
Chapter President's Office
Locksport Board Room
 

Weiser smart key first impression

Information about locks themselves. Questions, tips and lock diagram information should be posted here.

I always say

Postby raimundo » 8 May 2007 20:52

I always say that if you cant pick it, and nde is necessary, you have to impression a key, now I know that you picked one, but do you think the mechanism could stand the forces of impressioning, considering that its on the kw1 blank which is readily available for impressioning. Just speculation on my part.
Wake up and smell the Kafka!!!
raimundo
 
Posts: 7130
Joined: 21 Apr 2004 9:02
Location: Minnneapolis

Postby zeke79 » 8 May 2007 21:19

The lock can withstand the forces. As a test I took 5 new blanks and tried to force the cylinder to turn but in the end broke all 5 blanks. There was a slight bit of damage in that the wafers were distorted but the lock still functioned and resisted the test. Overall the lock is a good idea but poorly executed in the final product once you look at it closely.
For the best book out there on high security locks and their operation, take a look at amazon.com for High-Security Mechanical Locks An Encyclopedic Reference. Written by our very own site member Greyman! A true 5 Star read!!
zeke79
Admin Emeritus
 
Posts: 5701
Joined: 1 Sep 2003 14:11
Location: USA

first impression

Postby strkr » 30 May 2007 13:19

Zeke79 sir,

I heard about this bumping and have seen some videos, from some of your comments you said these locks are bump proof. Would you recommend me buying some for my house or should I try picking them first? What other flaws do you think they might have? You also said key control was one of the weakness, how big of an issue is that? If you weight the benefits of the lock, does it out weight the bad or the other way around? I can't afford to buy a Medeco that's for sure. Are there other bump proof locks available that are within reason for cost? :?:
strkr
 
Posts: 16
Joined: 30 May 2007 10:49
Location: california

Postby zeke79 » 30 May 2007 14:54

I would not put them on my home no. As far as how big of an issue is key control? To answer your question, how hard to you want it to be for me to make a copy of your key if I a. see a picture of it b. have it in my posession for a few minutes c. impression it, etc.
For the best book out there on high security locks and their operation, take a look at amazon.com for High-Security Mechanical Locks An Encyclopedic Reference. Written by our very own site member Greyman! A true 5 Star read!!
zeke79
Admin Emeritus
 
Posts: 5701
Joined: 1 Sep 2003 14:11
Location: USA

Postby JackNco » 30 May 2007 15:32

that said you have have pretty expensive locks on your house. I know a lot of people disagree with me on this but i think as long as you have a better lock that the guy next door then its good enough. theres no point having a $300 lock on a door by a single pane of glass. locks enough are not enough for security.

remember most break ins will not be a thief picking a lock, bumping is on the rise but ide say impressioning is pretty rare (IMHO)

Thats just my 2cents though

John
Image
JackNco
 
Posts: 3149
Joined: 14 Apr 2006 12:26
Location: Coventry. UK

Postby strkr » 30 May 2007 15:43

if key control is the only issue, then it should still be better than other residential locks. I will get the benefits of bump and pick resistance. impressioning takes some skill and knowledge for some people, but bumping is not. Sure the KW1 keyway allows for regular picks to be use, but it is still resistant to picking than other pin and tumbler locks. Currently I have the Schlage B360 deadbolts on my door, but it is still a pin and tumbler. I can still pick them within 5 minutes even with the spool shape top pins. you said it took you 20 minutes for your first try for the new weiser lock, don't you consider that better than the Schlage then?
strkr
 
Posts: 16
Joined: 30 May 2007 10:49
Location: california

Postby zeke79 » 30 May 2007 15:46

There are flaws other than the mechanical design of the locking mechanism itself that make the lock bad. Picking resistance is only part of the security matrix that makes a good lock.
For the best book out there on high security locks and their operation, take a look at amazon.com for High-Security Mechanical Locks An Encyclopedic Reference. Written by our very own site member Greyman! A true 5 Star read!!
zeke79
Admin Emeritus
 
Posts: 5701
Joined: 1 Sep 2003 14:11
Location: USA

Postby strkr » 30 May 2007 15:56

zeke79
Site Admin


Joined: 02 Sep 2003
Posts: 3937
Location: Illinois
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 4:46 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There are flaws other than the mechanical design of the locking mechanism itself that make the lock bad. Picking resistance is only part of the security matrix that makes a good lock.


I don't understand. I thought pick resistance is everything.....until bumping became an issue. Doesn't a side bar mechanism as you guys mentioned gives better resistance to picking than a pin and tumbler? what flaw are you refering to?
strkr
 
Posts: 16
Joined: 30 May 2007 10:49
Location: california

Postby TOWCH » 30 May 2007 17:40

Brute force resistence is the most important if it has anything worthy of the name lock. Speaking of which, is that the flaw? That plug and shell looks like a cork to me.
TOWCH
 
Posts: 1587
Joined: 20 Jul 2004 0:19
Location: Oregon

Postby TOWCH » 30 May 2007 17:40

Brute force resistence is the most important if it has anything worthy of the name lock. Speaking of which, is that the flaw? That plug and shell looks like a cork to me.
TOWCH
 
Posts: 1587
Joined: 20 Jul 2004 0:19
Location: Oregon

Postby Eyes_Only » 30 May 2007 18:00

I read somewhere that lockpicking is only involved 2% of the time out of all break-in crimes.
If a lock is a puzzle, then its key is the complete picture
Eyes_Only
Supporter
Supporter
 
Posts: 4111
Joined: 17 Dec 2003 20:33

Postby strkr » 30 May 2007 19:16

interesting only 2% then what's the remaining 98%???
strkr
 
Posts: 16
Joined: 30 May 2007 10:49
Location: california

Postby Eyes_Only » 30 May 2007 22:01

Something like 48% is forced entry and the rest (sadly enough) happens because people just don't lock their doors and windows.
If a lock is a puzzle, then its key is the complete picture
Eyes_Only
Supporter
Supporter
 
Posts: 4111
Joined: 17 Dec 2003 20:33

Postby TOWCH » 30 May 2007 22:02

TOWCH
 
Posts: 1587
Joined: 20 Jul 2004 0:19
Location: Oregon

Postby strkr » 30 May 2007 22:20

sad....to hear that. i can't believe it though :shock:
strkr
 
Posts: 16
Joined: 30 May 2007 10:49
Location: california

Previous

Return to Locks

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest