Pull up a chair, grab a cold one, and talk about life as a locksmith. Trade stories of good and bad customers, general work day frustrations, any fun projects you worked on recently, or anything else you want to chat about with fellow locksmiths.
by Eazy123 » 31 Jan 2017 14:24
I'm not a locksmith but I figured I may be able to get some tips here as I've been asked to do a small job.
Word of my interest in locks for the past year has gotten out among people I know and a local Masonic lodge has asked if I can re-pin their three IC locks. The person who asked suggested that I just make one of the key pins (say, position 7) longer and file the key a little deeper at 7. From what I've read, pin stacks in IC cores should be balanced, so is this a good idea?
-

Eazy123
-
- Posts: 206
- Joined: 17 Jul 2016 12:13
- Location: Chicagoland
by Tyler J. Thomas » 31 Jan 2017 14:46
No, the pin stack "make up", so to speak, will change. The top pin will remain the same, the other 2 or 3, depending on if it's master keyed, will change (if you want the existing control key to work, at least). When you change the bottom pin, the build-up/control pin and master pin(s), if applicable, will need to be changed as well to compensate for this change.
I wrote an article for my blog (link in signature) about SFIC math. Read it and that should hopefully clarify the relationship of all pins.
-
Tyler J. Thomas
- Supporter

-
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: 13 Aug 2009 20:57
- Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
by dtsh » 31 Jan 2017 14:52
In general, the tolerances for IC cores are tight, making them very unforgiving of errors/deviations. Since these have a control key, operating key, plus the possibility of some masters, sub masters, etc. I wouldn't consider it unless you're somewhat familiar with how the ICs work (controls vs operation) and have an appropriate pinning kit. This should at least get you to see what you'll be dealing with. http://www.bestaccess.com/files/4614/61 ... 011916.pdf
-
dtsh
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 23 Jan 2017 11:57
by Eazy123 » 31 Jan 2017 14:53
Tyler J. Thomas wrote:No, the pin stack "make up", so to speak, will change. The top pin will remain the same, the other 2 or 3, depending on if it's master keyed, will change (if you want the existing control key to work, at least). When you change the bottom pin, the build-up/control pin and master pin(s), if applicable, will need to be changed as well to compensate for this change.
I wrote an article for my blog (link in signature) about SFIC math. Read it and that should hopefully clarify the relationship of all pins.
Thank you - I will read your article. It's not master keyed - there is one control key and all three are keyed the same for access. Basically one for the back door and two for the front door.
-

Eazy123
-
- Posts: 206
- Joined: 17 Jul 2016 12:13
- Location: Chicagoland
by Eazy123 » 31 Jan 2017 14:58
dtsh wrote:In general, the tolerances for IC cores are tight, making them very unforgiving of errors/deviations. Since these have a control key, operating key, plus the possibility of some masters, sub masters, etc. I wouldn't consider it unless you're somewhat familiar with how the ICs work (controls vs operation) and have an appropriate pinning kit. This should at least get you to see what you'll be dealing with. http://www.bestaccess.com/files/4614/61 ... 011916.pdf
A couple of months ago I was given an IC free from a lock shop and took it apart to get a better understanding of how they work. So I have a basic understanding of how they work but I would have figured it's not as easy as a longer key pin in one stack and filing that location lower on the key - if anything I thought a longer key pin and a shorter center pin would suffice.
-

Eazy123
-
- Posts: 206
- Joined: 17 Jul 2016 12:13
- Location: Chicagoland
by GWiens2001 » 31 Jan 2017 22:02
It takes tools to properly reassemble a Best SFIC.
Gordon
Just when you finally think you have learned it all, that is when you learn that you don't know anything yet.
-

GWiens2001
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 7550
- Joined: 3 Sep 2012 16:24
- Location: Arizona, United States
by tpark » 31 Jan 2017 23:15
If I didn't have the tools already, I'd be inclined to get 3 keyed alike cores and a bunch of keys from a local locksmith and replace 'em all. Since door locks are an "in use" item, you really don't want the cores to screw up, and they may get some heavy usage. If something screws up, then suddenly it's your problem, but if the cores come from a locksmith, then the smith can address it. There's nothing magic about SFIC, but if a core gets jammed up, it can be a real headache. GWiens2001 is right - it does take the right tools to reassemble SFIC cores, plus proper code cutting equipment to do the keys. If you had a lab annex, a pinning kit for the system the cores were pinned to, and a supply of caps and springs, you could probably repin one of the chambers so one of the pins needed a deeper cut, then file that cut down on the keys to make it work. It can be done, but without the right tools, it's easy to screw the job up.
-
tpark
- Supporter

-
- Posts: 273
- Joined: 11 Nov 2015 14:11
by Robotnik » 31 Jan 2017 23:47
Agree with tpark and Gordon. If you're not fully equipped with SFIC tools and a pin kit, don't attempt working on these. I can combinate a core in my sleep, and easily pin them when I have access to tools, but don't do so at home for precisely the reasons stated.
-
Robotnik
- Supporter

-
- Posts: 668
- Joined: 3 Aug 2014 16:21
- Location: Portland, Oregon, United States
by Eazy123 » 1 Feb 2017 10:38
Thanks, all. I have access to the tools so I'll give it a shot.
-

Eazy123
-
- Posts: 206
- Joined: 17 Jul 2016 12:13
- Location: Chicagoland
by Raymond » 1 Feb 2017 20:01
Before you screw it up, PLEASE study the formulas and understand the pinning structure. SFIC is very exact and must use a balanced stack. If you change one pin length you must compensate with another. They are not difficult if you understand this.
Nothing is foolproof to a talented fool. Wisdom is not just in determining how to do something, but also includes determining whether it should be done at all.
-
Raymond
-
- Posts: 1357
- Joined: 18 Jan 2004 23:34
- Location: Far West Texas
by Eazy123 » 1 Feb 2017 23:21
Raymond wrote:Before you screw it up
I completed the job and everything works. Thanks for the vote of confidence, all. 
-

Eazy123
-
- Posts: 206
- Joined: 17 Jul 2016 12:13
- Location: Chicagoland
by GWiens2001 » 1 Feb 2017 23:50
Congrats, Easy123.  Gordon
Just when you finally think you have learned it all, that is when you learn that you don't know anything yet.
-

GWiens2001
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 7550
- Joined: 3 Sep 2012 16:24
- Location: Arizona, United States
by Eazy123 » 1 Feb 2017 23:59
GWiens2001 wrote:Congrats, Easy123.  Gordon
Thank you for all your advice and articles!  I still have plenty of reading to do.
-

Eazy123
-
- Posts: 206
- Joined: 17 Jul 2016 12:13
- Location: Chicagoland
by Raymond » 2 Feb 2017 21:09
We are glad to hear that you have had a successful project. Here's hopes for many more.
Nothing is foolproof to a talented fool. Wisdom is not just in determining how to do something, but also includes determining whether it should be done at all.
-
Raymond
-
- Posts: 1357
- Joined: 18 Jan 2004 23:34
- Location: Far West Texas
Return to Locksmith Lounge
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 8 guests
|