Lock Picking 101 Forum
A community dedicated to the fun and ethical hobby of lock picking.
       

Lock Picking 101 Home
Login
Profile
Members
Forum Rules
Frequent Forum Questions
SEARCH
View New Posts
View Active Topics


Live Chat on Discord
LP101 Forum Chat
Keypicking Forum Chat
Reddit r/lockpicking Chat



Learn How to Pick Locks
FAQs & General Questions
Got Beginner Questions?
Pick-Fu [Intermediate Level]


Ask a Locksmith
This Old Lock
This Old Safe
What Lock Should I Buy?



Hardware
Locks
Lock Patents
Lock Picks
Lock Bumping
Lock Impressioning
Lock Pick Guns, Snappers
European Locks & Picks
The Machine Shop
The Open Source Lock
Handcuffs


Member Spotlight
Member Introductions
Member Lock Collections
Member Social Media


Off Topic
General Chatter
Other Puzzles


Locksmith Business Info
Training & Licensing
Running a Business
Keyways & Key Blanks
Key Machines
Master Keyed Systems
Closers and Crash Bars
Life Safety Compliance
Electronic Locks & Access
Locksmith Supplies
Locksmith Lounge


Buy Sell Trade
Buy - Sell - Trade
It came from Ebay!


Advanced Topics
Membership Information
Special Access Required:
High Security Locks
Vending Locks
Advanced Lock Pick Tools
Bypass Techniques
Safes & Safe Locks
Automotive Entry & Tools
Advanced Buy/Sell/Trade


Locksport Groups
Locksport Local
Chapter President's Office
Locksport Board Room
 

possible to decode locks using x rays?

Having read the FAQ's you are still unfulfilled and seek more enlightenment, so post your general lock picking questions here.
Forum rules
Do not post safe related questions in this sub forum! Post them in This Old Safe

The sub forum you are currently in is for asking Beginner Hobby Lock Picking questions only.

Postby digital_blue » 20 Sep 2005 15:09

No, I was thinking safes. But, if the film were used on the other side of the whole safe, wouldn't you be x-raying the front door of the safe, the lock, all the contents of the safe, and the rear wall? I would assume that wouldn't be effective, but I'm just talking outta my DoNkEy here anyway.

So, someone who's familiar with this, fill me in here. When x-rays have been used to decode a safe lock in the past, does it involve using a film behind the rear wall or is there some other way? I'm pretty sure I'll never find myself x-raying a safe lock, but sinse I've been followng this thread it's got me curious, and now it's pretty much just academic for me.

db
Image
digital_blue
Admin Emeritus
 
Posts: 9974
Joined: 6 Jan 2005 15:16
Location: Manitoba

Postby kodierer » 20 Sep 2005 16:45

I am personally not very educated on hospital X-ray machines. Just live sources, and how that is done, and works.
So perhaps there is something I don't know. However you are right DB if you placed film on the back of a safe the contents would get in the way of the picture. Also it costs a lot to perform X-ray, so it would be cheaper just to drill in most cases. My guess is that they some how managed to slip film inside the safe. However keep in mind light can expose film, and dirt can ruin it. So film is cartriged in a cloth material. My only determination is that the safes you've heard about were already open, and they just needed the combo.
As to ultrasonic I would have to say no as far as I know. In non destructive testing ultra sonic is only used for testing thickness.
Next thing you know someone will ask about die penetrant
Image
kodierer
 
Posts: 819
Joined: 27 Aug 2004 12:45
Location: Utah

Postby quickpicks » 20 Sep 2005 17:45

Im not trying to get into anything using this technique. It was just a neat idea I had pop into my brain one day.
quickpicks
 
Posts: 751
Joined: 9 Jun 2004 14:44
Location: Ontario. Canada

Postby wtf|pickproof? » 20 Sep 2005 19:03

kodierer wrote:As to ultrasonic I would have to say no as far as I know. In non destructive testing ultra sonic is only used for testing thickness.
Next thing you know someone will ask about die penetrant


I don't know about steel, but I'm well aware US is used to produce 3d images of babies, organs, ...

It is also used in geological researches, in submarines, ....

Personally I think the biggest problem might be the air between the pins and the body of a lock. The echos of the pins might be too weak.
Image
Read this before you post to avoid serious flaming!
wtf|pickproof?
 
Posts: 387
Joined: 4 Jun 2005 8:13
Location: Austria

Postby The KeyMaster » 21 Sep 2005 1:23

SFGOON wrote: Your also not to leave a radioactive source unattended when not properly stored, and locked as the general public may get a hold of the source.


Just make sure it's not locked with a #3 Master Lock! :)

BTW, thanks for the informative post
The KeyMaster
 
Posts: 10
Joined: 9 Sep 2005 11:08

Postby ndgreen » 22 Sep 2005 20:31

DB,

I have used X-Ray for many imaging applications over the years, but have absolutely no exp in doing so with safes or vaults. I have always drilled and scoped.

I don't know if I am telling you guys how to 'suck eggs', but x-ray is a non-live system, where the picture obtained is static, i.e. it doesn't move.

A machine called a fluoroscope is available that provides a live, moving image, but can be much more dangerous in untrained hands.

In either case, AFAIK, the film or receptor will need to be either inside the safe, or behind the rear wall.

N.
Sometimes I beat the lock, sometimes the lock beats me!
ndgreen
 
Posts: 48
Joined: 24 Mar 2005 0:34
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby chopitup » 22 Sep 2005 20:51

Must do something. This lock is rated against radiographic attacks.
http://www.sglocks.com/prod_padlocks_8077ad.php
chopitup
 
Posts: 151
Joined: 15 Mar 2005 22:52
Location: USA

Postby ndgreen » 22 Sep 2005 20:58

Chopitup,

There is no doubt that x-ray COULD potentially be used to decode dial-based locking mechanisms, and the process would be very easy with a padlock, as access to both sides is easy.

The two questions in issue are:

1. Could the same thing be done with safes (I don't know)

2. Can it be used to decode locks (I don't think so, and there are easier ways).

All IMHO of course!

N.
Sometimes I beat the lock, sometimes the lock beats me!
ndgreen
 
Posts: 48
Joined: 24 Mar 2005 0:34
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby chopitup » 22 Sep 2005 21:01

I'm also curious about the possibility of ultrasound, as mentioned above.
chopitup
 
Posts: 151
Joined: 15 Mar 2005 22:52
Location: USA

Postby ndgreen » 22 Sep 2005 21:09

Chopitup,

I'm not too sure about ultrasound, as the resolution is not very good, and a lot of modern sytems use digitised images, which don;t help for fine detail.

I have used ultrasound for larger applications (imaging of suspected IED's and the like), but never tried it for locks. I may give it a go and find out for the group!

N.
Sometimes I beat the lock, sometimes the lock beats me!
ndgreen
 
Posts: 48
Joined: 24 Mar 2005 0:34
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby digital_blue » 22 Sep 2005 23:52

chopitup wrote:Must do something. This lock is rated against radiographic attacks.
http://www.sglocks.com/prod_padlocks_8077ad.php


I'm not sure I get the "30 minute protection against radiographic attack" thing. I mean, wouldn't it either be possible or impossible. I'm not sure I follow how a lock could resist a radiographic attack for a limited amount of time, then succumb to it eventually. I can understand that for drilling and the like, but I don't get it in that case.

db
Image
digital_blue
Admin Emeritus
 
Posts: 9974
Joined: 6 Jan 2005 15:16
Location: Manitoba

Postby chopitup » 23 Sep 2005 0:20

I would assume that additional shielding increases the time to decode the lock, and thus raises the time rating.
chopitup
 
Posts: 151
Joined: 15 Mar 2005 22:52
Location: USA

30 min

Postby sivlogkart » 23 Sep 2005 0:50

You are right, this does not make physical sense as it stands. However it might make sense in the context of a particular bit of kit being used, so I guess that is were it comes from.

KJ
sivlogkart
 
Posts: 298
Joined: 10 Sep 2005 1:43

Postby Shrub » 23 Sep 2005 6:22

To ultra sound a lock youve got to fill it with gel, ultra sound doesnt go through air very well, ive been looking at this since the thread last year on it but have yet to find a cheap machine,

To x-ray a safe you do get the contents in the picture but its all relitive, the metal parts of the lock is at the front of the pic and stands a darker shade than things behind it, its the same as looking at bones through the skin, the denser the material the easier it is to see, on safe xrays you see the money etc but can make out the lock parts very clearly,
Shrub
Moderator Emeritus
 
Posts: 11576
Joined: 23 May 2005 4:03
Location: uk

ultra sound

Postby sivlogkart » 23 Sep 2005 7:54

The problem with ultra sound is worse than that, as the two materials in that case are so very different. You would probably want to fill it with something that was much more solid. Ultra sound would be a bad option for this and several other reasons too.

KJ
sivlogkart
 
Posts: 298
Joined: 10 Sep 2005 1:43

PreviousNext

Return to Got Questions? - Ask Beginner Hobby Lockpicking Questions Here

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests