When it comes down to it there is nothing better than manual tools for your Lock pick Set, whether they be retail, homebrew, macgyver style. DIY'ers look here.
by salzi684 » 18 Mar 2004 15:28
Dukemurmur, no. It's not going to be measured in a unit of length. The point where a material starts to plastically deform is what you are looking for. It will be measured in some form of Force/Area. It's really not that hard to learn the stuff I was talking about. I would recommend that you get a book on materials and their properties. For now don't worry about all of the complex math just read over some of the chapters and get an idea of the concepts.
-
salzi684
-
- Posts: 337
- Joined: 10 Oct 2003 2:29
- Location: Detroit, Michigan
by plot » 18 Mar 2004 18:06
not sure what the topic is anymore...
anyways, was walking in the parking lot and saw something that looked kind of like a lockpick, a small 2 in 1 type of pick. bent down to look at it, and it was half of a pair of tweezers... for a makeshift pick for a newbie, i suppose if they find some thin tweezers they could grind off the top part on there driveway if they wanted too, then they'd have a somewhat managable small diamond/hookish looking pick.
-
plot
-
- Posts: 979
- Joined: 26 Feb 2004 5:53
- Location: Kansas City, MO (United States)
by i_want_to_pick » 18 Mar 2004 18:35
So if Aluminum is better than some steels why haven't I ever seen or heard of manufactured or homemade AL picks? There must be some kind of negative about it to keep them from being made.
Matt
-
i_want_to_pick
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: 16 Feb 2004 22:40
- Location: Ontario, Canada
by plot » 18 Mar 2004 18:56
Aluminum wouldn't last as long. would bend when picking. etc.
like i said, make a pick out of a popcan and tell us how well it works.
-
plot
-
- Posts: 979
- Joined: 26 Feb 2004 5:53
- Location: Kansas City, MO (United States)
by Chucklz » 18 Mar 2004 19:02
NO ALUMINUM WOULD NOT BE BETTER
Proof?
- Code: Select all
Young's Modulus Ultimate Strength Yield Strength 10^9 N/m^2 10^6 N/m^2 10^6 N/m^2 Steel 200 400 250 Aluminum 70 110 95
This is from Halliday , Resnick, Walker, Fundamentals of Physics, 5E,Extended, Wiley 1997
NB, I am NOT a MechE, or any kind of engineer, just a biologist, but the numbers don't lie.
-
Chucklz
-
- Posts: 3097
- Joined: 4 Nov 2003 17:58
- Location: Philadelphia
by Mad Mick » 18 Mar 2004 19:38
I've cracked my Aluminum bike frame
I broke my wookie once........
 If it ain't broke.....pull it down and see how it works anyway!
-
Mad Mick
-
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: 8 Jan 2004 19:19
- Location: UK
by Mad Mick » 18 Mar 2004 19:42
Duke, you really should consider the fact that you are being gently steered by very intelligent/educated professionals here!
 If it ain't broke.....pull it down and see how it works anyway!
-
Mad Mick
-
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: 8 Jan 2004 19:19
- Location: UK
by salzi684 » 18 Mar 2004 21:16
Weather or not a certain steel is stronger than a certain aluminum alloy depends entirely on the two alloys under comparison. Some aluminum alloys would be better suited for making picks than some steel alloys, but this is the exception to the rule.
But what it boils down to is that a decent steel, when considering the optimum qualities in a lock pick material, is better than a great aluminum alloy. But a great aluminum alloy would make a better pick than a bottom of the barrel steel.
Chuck, that chart is only good for one type of steel and one type of aluminum. It is not always the case.
-
salzi684
-
- Posts: 337
- Joined: 10 Oct 2003 2:29
- Location: Detroit, Michigan
by Mad Mick » 18 Mar 2004 21:44
For most of us though Salzi, durability and price is of apparent concern. It's nice to be personally able to obtain exotic materials to make picks out of, but for most of us, these materials are considered to be made from 'unobtainium'.
 If it ain't broke.....pull it down and see how it works anyway!
-
Mad Mick
-
- Posts: 2314
- Joined: 8 Jan 2004 19:19
- Location: UK
by i_want_to_pick » 18 Mar 2004 23:19
Quote: I've cracked my Aluminum bike frame
Mad Mick wrote: I broke my wookie once........
Yea but a new $1200 bike frame shouldn't have cracked. 
-
i_want_to_pick
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: 16 Feb 2004 22:40
- Location: Ontario, Canada
by Chucklz » 18 Mar 2004 23:36
Oh I know that chart is for one steel and aluminum but just as a generalization it tends to steer one to a reasonable conclusion.
-
Chucklz
-
- Posts: 3097
- Joined: 4 Nov 2003 17:58
- Location: Philadelphia
by hozer2k » 19 Mar 2004 0:11
Let me repeat AGAIN ok:
In ALL cases, steel is going to be about 3 times the stiffness of steel, period!
As far as strength goes, that is a totally different can of worms and we need to consider yield strength, ultimate strength, ductility, perhaps even fatigue life.
In general though steel is going to be a better choice. As someone mentioned, yes it is possible to find a real poor choice steel and and better aluminum (as far as strength, ductility, fatigue go ONLY). But it is far easier the other way around.
So lets recap:
1) Steel is ALWAYS about 3X the stiffness of aluminum.
2) In general steel will have better (overall) strength properties, but not always.
See 1) and 2) for the reason it is not a great idea to use aluminum for a lockpick.
As an aside, the main advantage with aluminum is it is about 1/3 the weight. In many applications this savings will outweigh the drop in stiffness and strength. There are other reasons that aluminum may be advantageous, but that is out of scope for our discussions. Since weight is not a real factor for a pick, aluminum is not a good candidate.
While we are at it...there are many high grade steels out there (that are rather pricey as well) that would make some of the best pics possible.
Examples would be 15-5PH and 17-4PH.
-
hozer2k
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: 2 Jan 2004 20:43
by hozer2k » 19 Mar 2004 0:12
Sorry, the first line should read steel is 3 times the stiffness of ALUMINUM in all cases...gosh darn it.
-
hozer2k
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: 2 Jan 2004 20:43
by PYRO1234321 » 19 Mar 2004 0:12
i was watching this thread for a while, so i figured i would add my 2 cents. regardless of all the numbers and comparisons to objects other than picks (i.e. bike frames) aluminum plain bites for picks of any durability. i've attempted to make picks and wrenches from just about everything under the sun (including some scrap titanium, fiberglass, various plastics, composites etc. etc...). Stainless/carbon/spring steel is the material of choice. Since the invention of locks in general, there have been picks and its no wonder that most are made of these materials.
FYI: titanium (mentioned in other posts) is not very strong in the dimentions of a pick, better than aluminum, but not as good as the forementioned steels (not to mention price). some plastics make good rakes (stiff nylon sheet) for people who use the quick extraction rake method. they can be made with scissors and the slight deformation of the plastic seems to be useful when raking (using standard hook and rake designs of slightly exagerated dimensions). i believe that the slight give may help keep set pins from being 'over picked', however the weakness is no good for pushing stubborn pins (thats what metal hooks are for  ).
cheers
-
PYRO1234321
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: 4 Dec 2003 19:01
- Location: CANADA
by sanskey » 19 Mar 2004 8:06
I started reading the posts here a couple days ago and got a lot of good ideas for DIY pics. It seems everyone has their favorite materials but, I didn't see any mention of piano wire.
I had some piano wire on hand ( 3/32" I think. ) and using pliers, file and a small vice I made my second pick. It looks similar to my first pick made from a paper clip but, it's a lot stronger.
-
sanskey
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 19 Mar 2004 7:33
Return to Lock Picks
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
|