
Alright.. so i don;t really like bumping.. but I was thinking as i was reading yet another article on it and began to think of what the real flaw was.
Ok Here we go, before i start relize this wont make it bump proof. But since theoretically the entire bumping principal is based on Newtons Laws of the transfer of motion.. and vaugley written, this theory can be exploited by adding some plus's and minus's to generate a diffrent outcome.. or force needed, and in a cost effective way for a consumer and a lockie

Okay, so i was looking at what makes locks suck and fall victim to Bumping, and it wasn't pins nor tollerences, but the springs becuase the most variables rely on springs within a pin tumber. The metal, the closness of the coils all add up to the downward pressure exerted n the top pins.
So to solve this problem its a two stepper. First we only replace the springs in the lock to a close coiled very very hard metal. So the downward pressure excerted on the pins is basically 10 to 20 times the normal.. maybe more.. i havent tested it yet. Don;t freak rember theres two parts

Now the other problem is the key, as all keys are cut with accute peaks. Think of a mountian range.. so we change this with either a modified key machine.. or just some files. And turn the mountain range into hills.. so to speak

I am talking about a rounded key. So when inserted into the lock, the pin breakdown is much less cut down... no sharp edges. You can also subside with hardened steel pins I suppose.. But i am going for company and consumer friendly here so bere with me.
So now goign back to the Physics law, we now have changed the equation. essintially taking the slight bump to more of a serious blow. So.. theoretically, it could be bumped.. we just manipulated the pressure to the pins to generate enough energy to lift the pins..IE. match the newer spring pressure. Like i said if its written vaugley it can be bent or even broken.. in this case we bent the it.
So cost? 5 or h/e many springs are int he lock. And if theres no key machine, a few needle files. SO anyone can do it and it will seriously hinder bumping to the point were the pressure needed to lift the pins or make them recess in the pin chambers would be so large of a blow that it would more or less just break the lock. And if a crappy Bump key was used.. or any with accute peaks were used.. it would get stuff or jsut not work.. and a round key woulnd't work.. beacuse its based on the spring pressure.. gotta love vauge physics

Granted as with all pin tumblers there will be pin corosion.. thats life. The rounded peaks will raise all pins and follow standard code.. jsut a diffrent shape cutting this down given the new pressure. Combined with say a well made lock could also boast a rating

So basically my claim is its not the locks pins nor tolleneces but the springs. As there flexing allows the pins to recess all at once.. alowign the principal to fall into place and work like a charm.
So the locks, keys, warding, constuction, and inner working order all stay consistant as they have though out history.. just a little tweaking.
Simply change springs and shape of key. Simple as bumping is.
Not full proof but it seems more plausable than any other idea I've read or came up with.
There you go, a rarity I Made a contribution

Have a good one fella's and feel free to comment.
Andy