Lock Picking 101 Forum
A community dedicated to the fun and ethical hobby of lock picking.
       

Lock Picking 101 Home
Login
Profile
Members
Forum Rules
Frequent Forum Questions
SEARCH
View New Posts
View Active Topics


Live Chat on Discord
LP101 Forum Chat
Keypicking Forum Chat
Reddit r/lockpicking Chat



Learn How to Pick Locks
FAQs & General Questions
Got Beginner Questions?
Pick-Fu [Intermediate Level]


Ask a Locksmith
This Old Lock
This Old Safe
What Lock Should I Buy?



Hardware
Locks
Lock Patents
Lock Picks
Lock Bumping
Lock Impressioning
Lock Pick Guns, Snappers
European Locks & Picks
The Machine Shop
The Open Source Lock
Handcuffs


Member Spotlight
Member Introductions
Member Lock Collections
Member Social Media


Off Topic
General Chatter
Other Puzzles


Locksmith Business Info
Training & Licensing
Running a Business
Keyways & Key Blanks
Key Machines
Master Keyed Systems
Closers and Crash Bars
Life Safety Compliance
Electronic Locks & Access
Locksmith Supplies
Locksmith Lounge


Buy Sell Trade
Buy - Sell - Trade
It came from Ebay!


Advanced Topics
Membership Information
Special Access Required:
High Security Locks
Vending Locks
Advanced Lock Pick Tools
Bypass Techniques
Safes & Safe Locks
Automotive Entry & Tools
Advanced Buy/Sell/Trade


Locksport Groups
Locksport Local
Chapter President's Office
Locksport Board Room
 

Master Lock Experiment

Picked all the easy locks and want to step up your game? Further your lock picking techniques, exchange pro tips, videos, lessons, and develop your skills here.

Master Lock Experiment

Postby Coonah » 5 Sep 2006 13:48

Im sure that this has come up somewhere.....

I had found a master lock (brand name) combo lock laying around and was wondering what the combo was. I found some sites that explained a method by pulling up on the "U" part of the lock while turnung it. There are 12 stoping points. I wrote them all down, and then crossed out the ones that didn't stop on a number (turning it left or right). It turned out that out of the remaing 7 or so numbers, three of them were the numbers to the lock. I was wondering if some other people would enjoy trying out this experiment, or if they had already had somethinglike this happen. I sure hoipe it wasn't coincedence.
Please post your findings.
I'm a PRODUCTIVE Procrastinator
Coonah
 
Posts: 2
Joined: 5 Sep 2006 1:09

Postby UWSDWF » 5 Sep 2006 13:53

yep thats one of the flaws there are a few posts on this subject and a mathimatical therom too
Image
DISCLAIMER:repeating anything written in the above post may result in dismemberment,arrest,drug and/or alcohol use,scars,injury,death, and midget obsession.
UWSDWF
Supporter
Supporter
 
Posts: 4786
Joined: 27 May 2006 13:01
Location: Toronto, ON. Canada

Postby Anarx » 5 Sep 2006 18:14

Being new here myself i have also found a Master Combo lock.

for some strange reason i was able to listen to the locking plates and hearing clicks some louder then others.. with the way they are desigend it would seem that this Might work but i was wondering if it is posabile to listen to it to try and get the combanation.

I figure i could allways do it the smart mans way but i've allways wondered how one would go about doing this by listening to the tumblers.

Just my thoughts

Jess
Anarx
 
Posts: 2
Joined: 5 Sep 2006 17:42

Postby Krypos » 5 Sep 2006 18:40

sorry anarx, but that probably wont work. i am in the process of finding a faster way to crack said locks, and the clicks you hear are the cams engaging the next one, this does not correlate to the gap being under the locking mechanism, what it does mean is that you are spinning 1, 2 or all three cams.

note* the two bottom cams (the first and second number in the combo) have the same spacing as every other lock, so the distance from the opening on cam 1 to the opening on cam 2 is the same for every lock, however, this means very little as even an inch of difference in the third cam means all the numbers are different.

im working on it as of lately, ill post any amazing findings.

also, good thinking. the clicks dont DIRECTLY correlate to it, but may be vital to finding it faster with some modification and whatnot.
Image
Krypos
 
Posts: 1829
Joined: 26 Apr 2006 23:05
Location: Oregon, USA

Postby ericm115 » 6 Sep 2006 23:55

Krypos,

Are you trying the safe manipulation technique (ie: the one detailed by Matt Blaze) on these locks? I've thought of trying it since it's such a similar mechanism. Every time I have free time though, I end up just picking locks. :P dumb locks.


em
Image
Original image copyright Toaplan. This qualifies as "fair use" under US Copyright law.
ericm115
 
Posts: 112
Joined: 13 Jul 2006 0:56
Location: Columbia, SC

shim

Postby shararm » 7 Sep 2006 0:52

I just use a good old fashion shim.
shararm
 
Posts: 69
Joined: 1 Sep 2006 21:12
Location: Santa Cruz, CA

Postby Krypos » 7 Sep 2006 1:12

ericm115 wrote:Krypos,

Are you trying the safe manipulation technique (ie: the one detailed by Matt Blaze) on these locks? I've thought of trying it since it's such a similar mechanism. Every time I have free time though, I end up just picking locks. :P dumb locks.


em


ahem. this may sound odd.

JUST BECAUSE MY POST COUNT IS NEARING 1,000, DO NOT THINK I KNOW ANYTHING.

i dont have access to the advanced section...i know...its pathetic. but like 3/4 of my posts are crap posts. and so i didnt meet the requirements for advanced section access.

so i might have the safe manipulation paper by matt blaze (as i have a crapload of pdfs etc i havent gone through) but i havent read it to my knowledge. and i dont know that ive even heard of it.

so maybe im even smarter than i look if im guessing something i dont know that matt blaze has written a paper for. sweet.

so i dont know....you tell me if im talking about the safe manipulation technique detailed by matt blaze. :lol:

pms are cool too.

shararm- shims are great for fast openings, but are useless if you are just wanting the combo. but yes.
Image
Krypos
 
Posts: 1829
Joined: 26 Apr 2006 23:05
Location: Oregon, USA

Postby New-York-Locksmith » 7 Sep 2006 10:53

shararm is right! i use old school shim
New-York-Locksmith
 
Posts: 121
Joined: 3 Sep 2006 5:01
Location: New York, NY

Postby Anarx » 7 Sep 2006 14:18

Well i was just hoping for a slightly more intresting way to retreave the combanation.. something with a little more fennese then just brute forcing 100 combos on the lock...

Just me thoughts on this
Anarx
 
Posts: 2
Joined: 5 Sep 2006 17:42

Postby ericm115 » 7 Sep 2006 14:40

Krypos,

Check out:

http://www.crypto.com/papers/safelocks.pdf

It's a long but very well written article. He details the method fairly well. I think this is the standard for safe manipulation. Note the similarities in this and the masterlock construction. It seems as though this same manipulation technique could be used to find the combo to a combolock...


Anyone heard of such a thing?

(ps.. this isn't about safecracking... its about masterlocks... so please don't lock the thread :D )

em
Image
Original image copyright Toaplan. This qualifies as "fair use" under US Copyright law.
ericm115
 
Posts: 112
Joined: 13 Jul 2006 0:56
Location: Columbia, SC

Postby lockedin » 7 Sep 2006 16:49

Krypos wrote:shararm- shims are great for fast openings, but are useless if you are just wanting the combo. but yes.

At least for me, shims have been the quickest way to finding the combo. After opening it I look inside until the three correct gates align at the opening, tranpose them to the opposing side, and apply pressure on the locking pawl while trying approximate numbers until the locking pawl lifts, in which case I know I have the correct combination.
Image
lockedin
 
Posts: 771
Joined: 11 Jun 2005 19:46
Location: CA

Postby Krypos » 7 Sep 2006 18:37

lockedin wrote:
Krypos wrote:shararm- shims are great for fast openings, but are useless if you are just wanting the combo. but yes.

At least for me, shims have been the quickest way to finding the combo. After opening it I look inside until the three correct gates align at the opening, tranpose them to the opposing side, and apply pressure on the locking pawl while trying approximate numbers until the locking pawl lifts, in which case I know I have the correct combination.


if that works...then great...im looking for a way to do it with out shimming...shimming has its place, but i prefer to not have to A) carry shims B) make shims on the spot C) build some sort of makeshift shim on the spot.

if it works for you....i wont say its wrong...im just trying to expand.
Image
Krypos
 
Posts: 1829
Joined: 26 Apr 2006 23:05
Location: Oregon, USA

Postby Coonah » 9 Sep 2006 17:33

Thanks for the feedbacl so far.

Just something else i noticed in order to eleminate the number of combos you have to try: out of thethree numbers in a lock, the last digit of two of them is the same. Prove me wrong please.
I'm a PRODUCTIVE Procrastinator
Coonah
 
Posts: 2
Joined: 5 Sep 2006 1:09

Postby Krypos » 9 Sep 2006 18:11

Coonah wrote:Thanks for the feedbacl so far.

Just something else i noticed in order to eleminate the number of combos you have to try: out of thethree numbers in a lock, the last digit of two of them is the same. Prove me wrong please.


what? as in you have a combo of like 22-32-6? hmm. i should look into this. this could be another anomaly directly caused by the fact that the 1st and 2nd cams are spaced the same. is it always the first and second digits you notice?

::::::DEEPLY INVOLVED AND PAYING ATTENTION::::::
Image
Krypos
 
Posts: 1829
Joined: 26 Apr 2006 23:05
Location: Oregon, USA

Postby Johnny P » 11 Sep 2006 5:34

Safe locks and Master padlocks are two completely different animals. what works on an S&G 3 wheel safe combination lock will not work of a master padlock.
Johnny P
Johnny P
 
Posts: 121
Joined: 31 Jan 2005 10:06

Next

Return to Pick-Fu [Intermediate Skill Level]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests