Lock Picking 101 Forum
A community dedicated to the fun and ethical hobby of lock picking.
       

Lock Picking 101 Home
Login
Profile
Members
Forum Rules
Frequent Forum Questions
SEARCH
View New Posts
View Active Topics


Live Chat on Discord
LP101 Forum Chat
Keypicking Forum Chat
Reddit r/lockpicking Chat



Learn How to Pick Locks
FAQs & General Questions
Got Beginner Questions?
Pick-Fu [Intermediate Level]


Ask a Locksmith
This Old Lock
This Old Safe
What Lock Should I Buy?



Hardware
Locks
Lock Patents
Lock Picks
Lock Bumping
Lock Impressioning
Lock Pick Guns, Snappers
European Locks & Picks
The Machine Shop
The Open Source Lock
Handcuffs


Member Spotlight
Member Introductions
Member Lock Collections
Member Social Media


Off Topic
General Chatter
Other Puzzles


Locksmith Business Info
Training & Licensing
Running a Business
Keyways & Key Blanks
Key Machines
Master Keyed Systems
Closers and Crash Bars
Life Safety Compliance
Electronic Locks & Access
Locksmith Supplies
Locksmith Lounge


Buy Sell Trade
Buy - Sell - Trade
It came from Ebay!


Advanced Topics
Membership Information
Special Access Required:
High Security Locks
Vending Locks
Advanced Lock Pick Tools
Bypass Techniques
Safes & Safe Locks
Automotive Entry & Tools
Advanced Buy/Sell/Trade


Locksport Groups
Locksport Local
Chapter President's Office
Locksport Board Room
 

Do Onguard locks = junk?

Having read the FAQ's you are still unfulfilled and seek more enlightenment, so post your general lock picking questions here.
Forum rules
Do not post safe related questions in this sub forum! Post them in This Old Safe

The sub forum you are currently in is for asking Beginner Hobby Lock Picking questions only.

Do Onguard locks = junk?

Postby Blueduck600 » 3 Mar 2007 21:01

Hi everyone,

I just bought a Onguard u-lock to replace my "pickable with a bic" Kryptonite locks.

I was hoping that this would be much better, but after looking at a picture of the lock mechanism I'm thinking I got suckered.

To see an image of the mec go to http://www.onguardlock.com/features/ click on the M-cylinder photo at bottom left, and a popup will show a larger image.

Is it just me or does this look like a regular wafer lock? All I have to do is grind all the lands off the key, making the shaft round and leaving the end square to turn the mechanism, and then I have a master key.

Any thoughts/experience with this?

I'm going to return the lock if this is true, so I don't want to grind down one of the keys that came with it. When I go to work on monday I'll make a pick out of aluminum or steal stock to test it.

After having $90 worth of u-locks turned unto worthless scrap by a 5 cent pen and now this, I'm officially irritated.

Blueduck600
[/img]
Blueduck600
 
Posts: 2
Joined: 25 Feb 2007 22:45
Location: Ohio, USA

Postby Wrenchman » 3 Mar 2007 21:15

Welcome to LP101

:D

Wrenchman
Before you pick a lock:
The first thing that you should do is check to make sure that
the lock is your's and secondly make sure its not in use.
Wrenchman
 
Posts: 588
Joined: 11 Sep 2005 19:04
Location: Brazil

Postby JackNco » 3 Mar 2007 22:05

Doesn't look like a wafer to me... i could be wrong though.

Look like you move the levers and allow that "Fence" to drop. that then allows the cylinder to turn. but i could be wrong.

All the best
Image
JackNco
 
Posts: 3149
Joined: 14 Apr 2006 12:26
Location: Coventry. UK

Postby Blueduck600 » 3 Mar 2007 22:28

JackNco

It looks to me like its just the opposite, and thats what makes it a bad lock.
The "fence" looks like its down in the lock position, so nothing is keeping it from being pushed up.(look at the photo series on the left of the photo.) the fence is down when the key is out(first photo) and up when the key is turned (third photo).


Hi Wrenchman,

thanks for the welcome
Blueduck600
 
Posts: 2
Joined: 25 Feb 2007 22:45
Location: Ohio, USA

Postby JackNco » 3 Mar 2007 22:38

well its not a photo its a CGI. but ide have to disagree. looks like when you turn the key it moves those disks and allows the fence to drop. and i see now way in which the end of the key is connected to them.

But thats just how i read it.
Image
JackNco
 
Posts: 3149
Joined: 14 Apr 2006 12:26
Location: Coventry. UK

Postby Eyes_Only » 3 Mar 2007 23:43

It seems like everyone is rushing to copy the abloy disk lock style all of the sudden.
If a lock is a puzzle, then its key is the complete picture
Eyes_Only
Supporter
Supporter
 
Posts: 4111
Joined: 17 Dec 2003 20:33

Postby mercurial » 4 Mar 2007 6:24

I agree with JackNco - this lock seems to be allow the 'fence' to fall once the discs are correctly aligned by the key - the same principle as an Abloy.

Eyes_Only is right in saying that there are many manufacturers making Abloy-Style disc-locks. However this is by no means a new thing they are rushing to do, they have been doing this for years, there have been cheap chinese copies of Abloy-style locks at the dollar shops here for a long time.

A search of this forum will find several threads made by people who bought a chinese Abloy clone from the dollar store, as well as threads discussing how to dismantle them.

Now, the same dollar-shops have some more pricey locks that appear to be based upon the newer, updated Abloy systems. I have yet to buy one to cut up to find out for sure....yet.

However, the keys for these more expensive chinese locks suggests they are more advanced technology than the cheaper clones of original Abloys.

The tolerances in the dollar-shop clones of original Abloy-style locks are often terrible. So bad that I eventually decided to file down a key with the deliberate intention of changing the bitting to make it not work in the lock - filing the key to a drastically different bitting (whilst keeping the cuts that steer the control discs the same) still operated the lock!

Even though I knew this was a cheap clone disc-lock, this stunned me!

That said, the principle behind this locking mechanism is secure enough that any picking techniques and tools or discussion thereof are restrocted to the advanced forums. Locks operating by this mecehanism that are manufactured to meet reasonable tolerances, are certainly far far more secure than the Kyptonite(and similar) tubular locks - imho.

...Mark
mercurial
 
Posts: 176
Joined: 22 Jul 2006 6:44
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Postby mercurial » 4 Mar 2007 6:37

excuse the double-post,

in the last paragraph of my previous post :
restrocted = resctricted
mecehanism = mechanism
Kyptonite = Kryptonite
:oops:

it definately must be bed-time for me!

...Mark
mercurial
 
Posts: 176
Joined: 22 Jul 2006 6:44
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Postby UWSDWF » 4 Mar 2007 6:44

without a picture of a real cut key.... i'd guess abloy style disc lock
Image
DISCLAIMER:repeating anything written in the above post may result in dismemberment,arrest,drug and/or alcohol use,scars,injury,death, and midget obsession.
UWSDWF
Supporter
Supporter
 
Posts: 4786
Joined: 27 May 2006 13:01
Location: Toronto, ON. Canada

Postby Spike666 » 4 Mar 2007 10:43

This looks like a bad cut-away job. the lock may seem to have two sidebars and several abloy style discs that would engage the sidebars and allow it to release.
If this lock was cheep it is lookin good for the lock industry. they put alot of thought into it's being different and secure.
disc locks can be picked but it isn't easy for the best, I am not one. I have never even attempted an abloy for I know how I put them togather and theres enough for me to worry about now.
play with it in your home, if you break it you said it is cheep , or buy another and ley us know if it is easily bypassed.
Spike
Spike666
 
Posts: 60
Joined: 16 Nov 2006 21:54
Location: Phila. PA

Postby pierre2 » 8 Mar 2007 7:44

I'm not a locksmith, though I did work in collaboration with the LEA.

But there is one thing I can tell you, if you go to the web site, you will see that they cannot spell correctly. This should have been the first hint that something is wrong. They wrote "offers optimum deturant..." . The word "deturant" doesn't exist. It is "deterrent". It reminds me of all those Chinese-made products with hard to read instructions due to poor English.

My 2 cents.
pierre2
 
Posts: 15
Joined: 7 Mar 2007 22:49

Postby Isakill » 8 Mar 2007 10:56

Yeah I try to stay away from products that have mispellings ect... Because if they won't take the time to proofread their products litrature then they didn't take the time to check quality control.

The only exception to this rule for me was a schumacher battery charger.... they missed 1 letter in the instruction manual. forgivable offence :lol:
Image
Isakill
 
Posts: 211
Joined: 24 Feb 2006 0:18
Location: West Virginia

Postby JackNco » 8 Mar 2007 17:25

Microsoft and AOL are good examples of this :P
Image
JackNco
 
Posts: 3149
Joined: 14 Apr 2006 12:26
Location: Coventry. UK

Postby mastermarc » 18 Jul 2007 9:39

so has anyone had any luck picking these yet? Or more importantly...what tools and how? I see these things everywhere and am anxious to buy one just to try it out.
mastermarc
 
Posts: 22
Joined: 4 Jul 2006 19:21

Postby Squelchtone » 19 Jul 2007 1:37

looks like the inner workings of the old Miracle Lock Co. laminated 10 lever padlock.


Squelchtone
Image
User avatar
Squelchtone
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11307
Joined: 11 May 2006 0:41
Location: right behind you.


Return to Got Questions? - Ask Beginner Hobby Lockpicking Questions Here

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests