Eyes_Only wrote:I'd doubt the company went that far to improve their product. Even if there are false grooves, cuts or whatever it'll probably offer only marginal security against a experienced and skilled picker.
Actually, I was trying to bring this up in the KWICKSET SAFEKEY thread (
viewtopic.php?t=25767) by Hinting about extreme Macs on the kryptonite ulocks (page 3). And jaako you shot me down cause you misunderstood me. Really, I was trying to explain a bypass method without giving away to much information.
I'm not going to give away to method, but I am going to tell you that it works, and why it worked, and why it doesn't work anymore because kryptonite made improvements to their Locks!
When kryptonite first came out with their abloy style ulocks, I am assuming they specified their own Maximum Adjacent Cut Specification on their locks to not be able to deviate from cut to cut more than a difference of 2. For example, a lock with be coded like:
024531-> see how the adjacent cuts never deviate more than 2 cuts?
This allowed for a very special type of bypass method that was extremely simple!!!! (Im not going to say how)
Now. More recently, kryptonite realized this, and respecified their MACs to be more extreme and this solved this problem altogether.