greyman wrote:As far as I know, the binomial theorem is not due to Newton.
pascal, sorry
but newton did do something there..
greyman wrote:Are you sure the manufacturer claims 40,000 combinations?
i already threw the package away:-\
but i'm positive it was 40,000
greyman wrote: If so, it may be possible to have other combinations that don't use 5 buttons
i can't really know because i've only got one, but what i can say is that when you go for more\less digitis than 5, your possibilities do decrease... besides, have you ever seen a lock with different ammounts of signs in their combos?
greyman wrote:or maybe order is important sometimes?
the order doesn't matter from the same reason the lock can't be opened the way Raymond had suggestet:
Raymond wrote:Pick these simple locks by applying pressure to the shackle and push each button looking for the ones that are "tightened". Five will be very tight and the lock will open when you push the fifth button.
though this technique does work with some of my other (wheel type) combo locks, this lock is proof...
you can notice the small button on the bottom of the lock..
once all the buttons that are in the combination are pushed, pushing this button frees the shackle, rather then it just poping up byitself..
i did try applying pressure while pushing the extra putton, and that didn't seem to work either...
thanks though
i am starting to think that a cheap chinese padlock has actually beaten you guys
hmm?