TOSL Project. A community project to "build a better mousetrap".
by Joker5BB » 18 Aug 2009 7:44
why a plastic key? ou can have a brass key, and even if the lock had nodymium magnets, i can just use non magnetic stainless steel pick's.
-
Joker5BB
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: 9 Dec 2007 22:20
- Location: NYC
by SnowyBoy » 24 Aug 2009 8:24
Joker5BB wrote:why a plastic key? ou can have a brass key, and even if the lock had nodymium magnets, i can just use non magnetic stainless steel pick's.
Yah, we already established by post 8 that the plastic key idea was flawed..... concidering the fact brass is no ferrous anyway. All we need to wait for now is someone to flame you for necroposting :p
What a load of old BiLocks!!!!
I'm probably 0 for 400 in looking for safes behind wall paintings
-
SnowyBoy
-
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: 15 Nov 2006 20:15
- Location: London UK
by NanoDuke » 8 Sep 2009 9:19
If you actually implemented these "magnetic springs" won't that make picking even easier. You can come at the lock from underneath with a large magnet and *bang* all the "springs" compress upwards. Then there will be no resistive force when you begin your SPPing. Raking would be a breeze.
-
NanoDuke
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: 26 Jul 2009 6:04
- Location: Sydney, Australia
by REparsed » 14 Sep 2009 16:42
If the bottom pins themselves were neodymium magnets and the plug were made of aluminum the pins would resist movement with a force proportional to the speed they were moving and defeat a bump (maybe).
If both top and bottom pins were neodymium magnets (or a magnet/ferrous metal pair) they would stick together and resist bumping.
-
REparsed
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 26 Sep 2006 17:40
- Location: NE Ohio
-
by LocksmithArmy » 14 Sep 2009 16:50
I have been expierimenting with neodymium magnets quite a bit recently for use in perpetual motion... they are quite brital. the force of bumping could quite possibly shatter a pin or 2.
-
LocksmithArmy
-
- Posts: 989
- Joined: 25 Jun 2009 22:14
-
by REparsed » 14 Sep 2009 20:50
Yes they are quite brittle. The would probably be best suited for use as top pins.
-
REparsed
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 26 Sep 2006 17:40
- Location: NE Ohio
-
by NanoDuke » 15 Sep 2009 5:00
It depends on how the magnets are polarized. You can have both top and bottom pins with opposing domains, that repel each other.
But I like your idea about them opposing motion. If you have a non-magnetic casing, with magnets as pins, you get eddy currents in the casing as the pins move. The eddy currents move in such a way as to oppose the kinetic motion. This would resist bumping.
-
NanoDuke
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: 26 Jul 2009 6:04
- Location: Sydney, Australia
by LocksmithArmy » 15 Sep 2009 14:07
NanoDuke wrote:It depends on how the magnets are polarized. You can have both top and bottom pins with opposing domains, that repel each other.
why would you have your top and bottom pins repel eachother man... that would open with no picking... it would leave a huge gap like it is constantly bumped, or am I missin somthing
-
LocksmithArmy
-
- Posts: 989
- Joined: 25 Jun 2009 22:14
-
by NanoDuke » 15 Sep 2009 23:37
Maybe I'm the one that's lost. I was going on the thought of having the magnets as a replacement for the springs. Yep, based on SnowyBoy's post on page one. I thought that's what we were still discussing. SnowyBoy wrote:Ok, how about this then.....
Brass everything as normal, little disc magnet set in the top of each top pin, another oposing magnet set in the stack cap.... no need for springs! Slight posibility it would be unbumpable then.
-
NanoDuke
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: 26 Jul 2009 6:04
- Location: Sydney, Australia
by LocksmithArmy » 16 Sep 2009 0:01
yeah thats magnets above the top pins and magnetic top pins sure... but not oposing top and bottom pins that would leave a gap because they would be pushing aginst eachother. you want the top pins to push down on the key pins.
-
LocksmithArmy
-
- Posts: 989
- Joined: 25 Jun 2009 22:14
-
by NanoDuke » 16 Sep 2009 0:31
Ah yes, you're right. I'm getting my terminology mixed up.
-
NanoDuke
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: 26 Jul 2009 6:04
- Location: Sydney, Australia
by Tyler J. Thomas » 17 Sep 2009 19:24
Any of you guys ever seen how Miwa utilizes magnets in regards to pin stacks? Truly ingenious design - only wish they had a bigger stake in the U.S. market. Best lock I've ever worked on.
-
Tyler J. Thomas
- Supporter

-
- Posts: 1133
- Joined: 13 Aug 2009 20:57
- Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
by SadisticPsycopath » 18 May 2010 14:56
Guys, original poster here. Forgot my account name. Made new account. Remembered old one in the shower.
My original idea was magnets that would repel the entering of a magnetised object. (Bump keys?). These would sit on either side of the lock.
It is possible, as long as the lock is not magnetised. But if the bump key is also not magnetised, then it is allowed to enter.
The repulsors, as I will now call them, cause it sounds cool, are just a secondary measure. Meant to stop some, but not all, methods of entry.
Thanks for your time.
And God said "Let there be light!", but the program crashed because he was trying to access the NULL value of a universe pointer.
-
SadisticPsycopath
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 16 May 2010 15:00
by mhole » 18 May 2010 17:35
Interesting. I'd also recommend having an engraving of a cross on the cylinder, this would prevent vampires picking the lock.
-
mhole
-
- Posts: 485
- Joined: 1 Jul 2007 14:36
by SadisticPsycopath » 19 May 2010 14:32
Okay. If the magnets were arranged so the pins had the opposing charge to a magnet below them, the pins would be harder to pick.
This is assuming that the pins are pointing towards the floor. (European style?)
And God said "Let there be light!", but the program crashed because he was trying to access the NULL value of a universe pointer.
-
SadisticPsycopath
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 16 May 2010 15:00
Return to The Open Source Lock
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests
|