Varjeal wrote:In reference to the lock pictured at the beginning of the thread, I can understand why the locksmith may have chosen to drill that particular lock, though he could have drilled it differently.
Regardless, here would be my reasoning:
1. I would have spent some time trying to pick that lock. However, the signs of corrosion around the plug are disturbing. I would have first lubricated that lock thoroughly with a good teflon/silicon spray. It doesn't look like that happened.
I agree.
2. That is not a very good quality lock, and who knows what kind of damage may have been inside that cylinder MAY have given problems to the picking process, corroded pins, springs, badly worn plug, improperly installed lock that put unnecessary pressure on the cylinder.
If you mean that a Yale is not a good quality lock, I would vehemently disagree with you. If you mean THAT Yale is not in good condition, I agree. I also agree with the rest of that quoted statement about the possible damage to the lock because of age and not being properly maintained, etc.
I'm not making excuses for the work he did, but I have run into similar difficulties from time to time and have been forced to drill the lock. I usually try to drill just the plug itself if the lock is going to be repaired. Looks like that one is toast.
In the mad rush to make every hour pay as much as possible, SOME Locksmiths have left the "craft" behind and they run to the drill instead of cultivating lockpicking skills. I don't think this can be denied, especially since it has been the norm in publications like The Locksmith Ledger for years, it has been an ongoing debate for a very long time.
Yet, only THAT Locksmith felt what he felt. By that I mean this, you stick a pick into an old lock and you feel the tumblers and you know if you have a problematic pin stack very quickly. He may have spent so little time on it because he was not very good, skilled, at Lockpicking. Entirely possible. But, he might have felt something and knew he had a spring that was hopelessly twisted around the driver and projecting into the plug, etc. The man with the pick in the keyway is going to know what he feels.
Over years of use, those pins and springs get quite the workout. The first pin stack will operate five times for every time the rear pin stack operates just once. Over years, this causes an incredible amount of wear and tear on the lock and a lot of really terrible things can happen as you and I have just outlined.
btw, the chances of mushroom pins in that type of lock are relatively slim.
I would disagree with that, older Yales routinely had mushroom drivers in them, given the appearance of that lock, I would bet it did unless a Locksmith deliberately removed them at some point in that lock's lifespan. I've seen that happen as well.