Lock Picking 101 Forum
A community dedicated to the fun and ethical hobby of lock picking.
       

Lock Picking 101 Home
Login
Profile
Members
Forum Rules
Frequent Forum Questions
SEARCH
View New Posts
View Active Topics


Live Chat on Discord
LP101 Forum Chat
Keypicking Forum Chat
Reddit r/lockpicking Chat



Learn How to Pick Locks
FAQs & General Questions
Got Beginner Questions?
Pick-Fu [Intermediate Level]


Ask a Locksmith
This Old Lock
This Old Safe
What Lock Should I Buy?



Hardware
Locks
Lock Patents
Lock Picks
Lock Bumping
Lock Impressioning
Lock Pick Guns, Snappers
European Locks & Picks
The Machine Shop
The Open Source Lock
Handcuffs


Member Spotlight
Member Introductions
Member Lock Collections
Member Social Media


Off Topic
General Chatter
Other Puzzles


Locksmith Business Info
Training & Licensing
Running a Business
Keyways & Key Blanks
Key Machines
Master Keyed Systems
Closers and Crash Bars
Life Safety Compliance
Electronic Locks & Access
Locksmith Supplies
Locksmith Lounge


Buy Sell Trade
Buy - Sell - Trade
It came from Ebay!


Advanced Topics
Membership Information
Special Access Required:
High Security Locks
Vending Locks
Advanced Lock Pick Tools
Bypass Techniques
Safes & Safe Locks
Automotive Entry & Tools
Advanced Buy/Sell/Trade


Locksport Groups
Locksport Local
Chapter President's Office
Locksport Board Room
 

"Should I be concerned about the requirement by Peterson

Having read the FAQ's you are still unfulfilled and seek more enlightenment, so post your general lock picking questions here.
Forum rules
Do not post safe related questions in this sub forum! Post them in This Old Safe

The sub forum you are currently in is for asking Beginner Hobby Lock Picking questions only.

"Should I be concerned about the requirement by Peterson

Postby Dave55347 » 6 Mar 2015 23:08

I want to buy the "Flat Five" torsion set from Peterson Manufacturing's web site......

I am NOT a locksmith, and I am NOT a member of the military, and I am NOT a member of the security industry: I am a hobbyist, although I was paid $50 to open an onsite lock box locked with two Master Lock #5 padlocks whose keys were missing. I don't think that qualifies me as a locksmith, although I substituted my services for his.

Peterson Manufacturing has a requirement at the end of their ordering page that specifies certain limitations as to who can actrually order from them.

I have the impression that the disclaimer at Peterson is to PREVENT criminals from ordering from them and that the government does not monitor the actual backgrounds of the Peterson customers. This is the conclusion that I've reached from researching the questions and answers on this forum.

When I e-mailed Ken Peterson, his reply (cryptic? humor?) was "Ask me no questions, and I'll tell you no lies...."

Is my conclusion correct? Is this just a way to discourage the criminal element and there is no need for me to have any valid concerns about ordering ? (I live in Minnesota, so I am not concerned about International regulations, just the domestic ones).

What insights can you share ?

Have you ever been contacted by local police or the FBI or any such agency when you ordered lock picking equipment?

Please advise.....

Dave55347
Dave55347
 
Posts: 8
Joined: 4 Jan 2015 22:13

Re: "Should I be concerned about the requirement by Peterson

Postby GWiens2001 » 6 Mar 2015 23:16

Just place your order. It will not be a problem. They do not verify if you are a locksmith. Some states (including mine) do not even have a locksmith license to verify.

Gordon
Just when you finally think you have learned it all, that is when you learn that you don't know anything yet.
User avatar
GWiens2001
Site Admin
 
Posts: 7550
Joined: 3 Sep 2012 16:24
Location: Arizona, United States

Re: "Should I be concerned about the requirement by Peterson

Postby billdeserthills » 6 Mar 2015 23:16

I betcha You'll be immediately placed on a secret watch list, care of homeland security and I also thought of this;
They're coming to take me away, ha ha. They're coming to take me away
To the funny farm, where life is grand...

Fortunately this forum has tons of info on the making of Your very own tools and it isn't just for the paranoid

D@mmit, Gordon beat me!
billdeserthills
 
Posts: 3827
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 21:11
Location: Arizona

Re: "Should I be concerned about the requirement by Peterson

Postby cheerIO » 6 Mar 2015 23:17

My suggestion is to just place an online order and see what happens.

And take Ken's advice. Don't ask any questions, not to him and not here.

(don't worry)
cheerIO
 
Posts: 301
Joined: 24 Jun 2014 16:21
Location: Florida

Re: "Should I be concerned about the requirement by Peterson

Postby Comrade627 » 7 Mar 2015 0:32

If the government ends up watching y...
Remember: Pick something every day, no matter how small and insignificant it may be…it helps maintain proficiency.”

SPP purist.
Comrade627
 
Posts: 290
Joined: 12 Sep 2011 10:41
Location: Melbourne, Florida

Re: "Should I be concerned about the requirement by Peterson

Postby nick08037 » 7 Mar 2015 0:39

It is primarily a USPS thing...

For the purpose of this exercise you are a "bona fide locksmith", even in most US jurisdictions that regulate locksmiths said regulations almost never apply to and exempt in-house facilitates locksmith staff and the work that they do.

39 U.S.C.
United States Code, 2011 Edition
Title 39 - POSTAL SERVICE
PART IV - MAIL MATTER
CHAPTER 30 - NONMAILABLE MATTER
Sec. 3002a - Nonmailability of locksmithing devices
From the U.S. Government Printing Office, http://www.gpo.gov
§3002a. Nonmailability of locksmithing devices
(a) Any locksmithing device is nonmailable mail, shall not be carried or delivered by mail, and shall be disposed of as the Postal Service directs, unless such device is mailed to—
(1) a lock manufacturer or distributor;
(2) a bona fide locksmith;
(3) a bona fide repossessor; or
(4) a motor vehicle manufacturer or dealer.
(b) For the purpose of this section, “locksmithing device” means—
(1) a device or tool (other than a key) designed to manipulate the tumblers in a lock into the unlocked position through the keyway of such lock;
(2) a device or tool (other than a key or a device or tool under paragraph (1)) designed for the unauthorized opening or bypassing of a lock or similar security device; and
(3) a device or tool designed for making an impression of a key or similar security device to duplicate such key or device.
(Added Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7090(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4409.)

If they ship UPS, FedEx or DHL it would not even be a question.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
User avatar
nick08037
 
Posts: 146
Joined: 26 Dec 2014 9:56
Location: Southern New Jersey

Re: "Should I be concerned about the requirement by Peterson

Postby deolslyfox » 7 Mar 2015 11:40

Short answer. No
deolslyfox
 
Posts: 128
Joined: 15 Feb 2015 17:01

Re: "Should I be concerned about the requirement by Peterson

Postby billdeserthills » 7 Mar 2015 15:51

In some places You should be concerned about having "burglary tools" in your possession, especially when mr policeman with the bad attitude searches Your vehicle and finds them
billdeserthills
 
Posts: 3827
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 21:11
Location: Arizona

Re: "Should I be concerned about the requirement by Peterson

Postby nickmannnxx » 8 Mar 2015 8:10

The only time my picks ever end up in my car they are accompanied by a large box of locks for picking, 20 padlocks and 30 or so cylinders. Im pretty sure in a situation like this I should be able to prove intent. My girlfriend's uncle is a police officer and told me something that I think relates to carrying picks. A baseball bat in the trunk of a car is a weapon. A baseball bat, baseball glove, balls in a trunk is a bunch of sports equipment.
nickmannnxx
 
Posts: 113
Joined: 20 Nov 2014 3:28
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: "Should I be concerned about the requirement by Peterson

Postby Doobner » 13 Apr 2020 4:42

I know it’s 5 years later. Not sure how you all feel about resurrected old posts here. The unrelated topic forum that I’m on finds them amusing.

Anyways, my question is simply, “would that be the same case with most all other companies?” I am the US, and I heard that it’s just a postal thing. Maybe I should ask instead, “are there any companies listed in the thread about where to buy your picks that I should be concerned about- or just not bother with?”.

Any more info would be appreciated! :D
Doobner
 
Posts: 32
Joined: 8 Apr 2020 1:27
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: "Should I be concerned about the requirement by Peterson

Postby Squelchtone » 13 Apr 2020 7:17

Doobner wrote:I know it’s 5 years later. Not sure how you all feel about resurrected old posts here. The unrelated topic forum that I’m on finds them amusing.

Anyways, my question is simply, “would that be the same case with most all other companies?” I am the US, and I heard that it’s just a postal thing. Maybe I should ask instead, “are there any companies listed in the thread about where to buy your picks that I should be concerned about- or just not bother with?”.

Any more info would be appreciated! :D


oof.. We try not to wake up posts from that long ago unless an unanswered question is finally getting circled back to, even then the parties who posted it are often no longer active on the forum.

I think we used to scorn people a lot more for it, but it shows they are Searching before just starting a new thread, so I consider that a good thing. I think threads a year or younger are fair game, anything older, there should be a solid reason to wake the thread up, but that's just my personal opinion and not an official rule.

I looked at your other posts and it seems you are looking to buy a pick set. All these questions and concerns are the same ones a lot of others had over the years and nothing bad ever happened, so just order what you want and wait for it to arrive in the mail. The SWAT team is not gonna be hiding in the mailman's truck ready to jump out on you.

If you do get some lock picks mailed to you, practice the hobby at home on your own practice locks, and don't brag or show off to friends at the local bar (not that you can do that right now anyway) but a lot of people get excited about this new found power and shoot their mouth to the wrong people.

Also, if you are truly concerned, please fill out your profile so we at least know what state or jurisdiction you are in so we can quote you some local laws or someone from your area can chime in with their experience of ordering tools online.

Squelchtone
Image
User avatar
Squelchtone
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11307
Joined: 11 May 2006 0:41
Location: right behind you.

Re: "Should I be concerned about the requirement by Peterson

Postby Doobner » 13 Apr 2020 7:29

Ok, noted on the old posts, all good then. I guess I was thinking it would be better to tack something onto an existing post, rather than maybe start a new one. Different strokes on different forums. I can respect your preferences! Will do my best not to be tacky.

Thanks for the info! I plan to just practice at home anyways.

I don’t know how to add that info to my profile, will look for the instructions here.

But anyways, I am in Minnesota.
Doobner
 
Posts: 32
Joined: 8 Apr 2020 1:27
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: "Should I be concerned about the requirement by Peterson

Postby flyingron » 14 Apr 2020 8:24

Yes, that's what the USPS rules say. They date back to the sixties. As pointed out in this date of internet ordering and common carriers (not just UPS/FEDEX but even Amazon's own exploited delivery contractors), it's one of the most ignored rules. Lock tools are so small and light that USPS is actually the easiest way to send them. I've never had anybody ask, so I suspect Peterson just put it there to cover their rear (well they said they were a legal place to ship to).
flyingron
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 11 Apr 2020 12:46

Re: "Should I be concerned about the requirement by Peterson

Postby demux » 14 Apr 2020 16:09

flyingron wrote:I've never had anybody ask, so I suspect Peterson just put it there to cover their rear (well they said they were a legal place to ship to).


Yeah, it's probably one of those things that's only selectively enforced if you're caught doing something else dumb and the Law wants to make an example of you. Sort of how if you kick in the front window on a store, you'll get charged with B&E. If you kick in the front window on a store and have a set of lock picks in your pocket, you'll get charged with B&E and possession of burglary tools.

That said, as others have pointed out, if you do actually work on locks, even just for a private entity (e.g. you're not hanging out a shingle and advertising yourself as a locksmith), you would likely quality as a bona fide in-house locksmith and be technically legal under that rule.
demux
 
Posts: 510
Joined: 27 Apr 2017 11:14
Location: Indiana, USA


Return to Got Questions? - Ask Beginner Hobby Lockpicking Questions Here

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 27 guests