TOSL Project. A community project to "build a better mousetrap".
by fgarci03 » 8 May 2013 5:45
Ha! Great! Never thought about that!
Go ahead, keep plugging away, picking on me! You will end up on bypass or with rigor mortise. - GWiens2001
-
fgarci03
-
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: 18 Dec 2012 21:38
- Location: Porto/Portugal
-
by ARF-GEF » 8 May 2013 5:51
I don't think it's feasible. You would have to fill it, close it watertight, and pick it at the same time? I don't think you could pick and close it and manipulate the lock with a pick at the same time. At least it would be greatly difficult. Even if you could: Cylinders are not watertight, they would leak out in the back. (or in the middle in case of Euro cylinders) Also the resistance of salty water would be very different from a brass or a steel key.  Alone closing the back of the lock watertight would be veery hard to do.
To infinity... and beyond!
-
ARF-GEF
-
- Posts: 1154
- Joined: 26 Oct 2012 11:14
- Location: faraway and mythical land of eastern europe:)
by Quickpicknpay » 8 May 2013 7:10
Yes, but if you have ever lubricated a lock (I'm sure you have) you would see that the lube gets into every little nook and cranny working its way up beside the bottom and top pins and staying there for some time. I Think the liquid would still make contact and complete the circuit for a while withought having to keep it "full" of liquid.
-
Quickpicknpay
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: 3 May 2013 6:25
- Location: Sydney, Australia
by ARF-GEF » 8 May 2013 7:57
Possibly yes  I'm not sure. I guess we would have to try it to see it.  But if you think about my idea (electric contact on both the top and the bottom of the keyway) that would make this liquid solution much harder. But I've been wondering about it and I think that a longer used lock may have connection problems in itself due to wear (abrasion).
To infinity... and beyond!
-
ARF-GEF
-
- Posts: 1154
- Joined: 26 Oct 2012 11:14
- Location: faraway and mythical land of eastern europe:)
by Raymond » 8 May 2013 20:43
All right scheemers, design this.
Suppose you have a lock where you insert the key, turn it 15 degrees, and insert it deeper. The second set of pins cannot be reached in a straight line because of the 2 - 90 degree turns that the bent key blank has to navigate.
Nothing is foolproof to a talented fool. Wisdom is not just in determining how to do something, but also includes determining whether it should be done at all.
-
Raymond
-
- Posts: 1357
- Joined: 18 Jan 2004 23:34
- Location: Far West Texas
by Quickpicknpay » 8 May 2013 21:49
I am not sure if I understand this fully but if you can insert the key lets say halfway and then turn to then fully insert the key and turn again to open the lock, couldnt you just pick the first half to the right angle and then pick the next half? You say it has a bent key. How does it get inserted fully with a bend in it? I think I need a little more info to better understand how it works.
-
Quickpicknpay
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: 3 May 2013 6:25
- Location: Sydney, Australia
by Raymond » 8 May 2013 22:21
I am trying to imagine a key with two bends in the bow before the cuts start. The cuts go completely into the lock to set the pins. Something on the base, tip or shoulder prevents the key from going deeper until the plug is turned. In turning, the plug is covered by a blocking plate and the key goes in another cut deeper. The face of the lock would prevent direct access to the pins after the plug is turned. You could pick the first turn but after the keyway is blocked to a straight view you can no longer access the pins. This is similar to the curtain and a ward on a lever lock but would have a separate set of levers after turning and pushing. Haven't built it, just brainstorming.
Nothing is foolproof to a talented fool. Wisdom is not just in determining how to do something, but also includes determining whether it should be done at all.
-
Raymond
-
- Posts: 1357
- Joined: 18 Jan 2004 23:34
- Location: Far West Texas
by Quickpicknpay » 8 May 2013 23:02
I'm guessing this would require two sets of top pins and springs for the key to move in to reach the final bottom pin otherwise it would not be able to move as you wouldn't be able to lift the first set of pins allready at the shear line. Unless the plug was split before the final pin and there was a spring between the first and final section of the plug allowing it to engage the back section of the plug when pushed in and then lift the final pin to turn further. But this could still be manipulated. I may have missed something as I'm immagining a few different variations of this in my head, keeping in mind how each variation can be defeated. I like the idea of a front curtain though. Food for thought. Brainstorming is good, more of this creates a snowball effect and many ideas branch off into hopefully what will turn out to be a pretty good lock as an end result.
-
Quickpicknpay
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: 3 May 2013 6:25
- Location: Sydney, Australia
by mh » 8 May 2013 23:31
If a key that's pushed in further should still turn, the "front pins" would need some type of master keying, or the shear line would have to be disabled in some other way (maybe a mobile part) at the second position. But a nice idea indeed. Think "Lafette".
Cheers mh
"The techs discovered that German locks were particularly difficult" - Robert Wallace, H. Keith Melton w. Henry R. Schlesinger, Spycraft: The secret history of the CIA's spytechs from communism to Al-Qaeda (New York: Dutton, 2008), p. 210
-
mh
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 2437
- Joined: 3 Mar 2006 4:32
- Location: Germany
-
by IndigoChild » 12 May 2013 20:54
You mentioned that it is a victim of key duplication as is many locks. If you think about it medeco are able to be beat with a credit card.
"How does it work?" "Only one way to find out. Open it up!"
-
IndigoChild
-
- Posts: 236
- Joined: 1 Feb 2013 13:50
by Br0keN » 29 Sep 2016 16:11
IndigoChild wrote: If you think about it medeco are able to be beat with a credit card.
I would like to see a tutorial on this.
-
Br0keN
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: 23 Feb 2016 1:35
by Robotnik » 29 Sep 2016 17:08
Br0keN wrote:IndigoChild wrote: If you think about it medeco are able to be beat with a credit card.
I would like to see a tutorial on this.
It is possible, though likely not what you're thinking. Probably isn't appropriate for discussion outside of Advanced, however.
-
Robotnik
- Supporter

-
- Posts: 668
- Joined: 3 Aug 2014 16:21
- Location: Portland, Oregon, United States
by kwoswalt99- » 29 Sep 2016 17:17
Robotnik wrote:Br0keN wrote:IndigoChild wrote: If you think about it medeco are able to be beat with a credit card.
I would like to see a tutorial on this.
It is possible, though likely not what you're thinking. Probably isn't appropriate for discussion outside of Advanced, however.
Buy Open in Thirty Seconds, or you can find the info on the web.
-
kwoswalt99-
-
- Posts: 1218
- Joined: 17 Mar 2015 15:35
- Location: Somewhere.
by smokingman » 30 Sep 2016 0:06
I would think that keeping parts and gizmos to a minimum would be more reliable and less likely to bypass. You could end up with a lock with as many segments as a centipede. My father in law who was an engineer always told me "the fancier you make the plumbing,the easier it is to clog the drain".
What is the best way to educate the masses? ... " A television in every home." What is the best way to control the masses? ... " A television in every room." From "Charlie" AKA " Flowers for Algernon"
-

smokingman
-
- Posts: 337
- Joined: 15 May 2013 12:09
by Joshua904 » 1 Oct 2016 5:41
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezoelectric_sensorThis may give you some ideas. You could either use the force from inserting the key to charge your battery, if you still want to go that route. Or possibly engineer something (I think) would be new. Instead of using two pins to create a sheer line, use a single pin in each stack, sense the force applied and if all equal true, release a side bar. Good luck!
-

Joshua904
-
- Posts: 134
- Joined: 5 Jan 2016 6:57
- Location: Jacksonville, FL
Return to The Open Source Lock
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
|