Lock Picking 101 Forum
A community dedicated to the fun and ethical hobby of lock picking.
       

Lock Picking 101 Home
Login
Profile
Members
Forum Rules
Frequent Forum Questions
SEARCH
View New Posts
View Active Topics


Live Chat on Discord
LP101 Forum Chat
Keypicking Forum Chat
Reddit r/lockpicking Chat



Learn How to Pick Locks
FAQs & General Questions
Got Beginner Questions?
Pick-Fu [Intermediate Level]


Ask a Locksmith
This Old Lock
This Old Safe
What Lock Should I Buy?



Hardware
Locks
Lock Patents
Lock Picks
Lock Bumping
Lock Impressioning
Lock Pick Guns, Snappers
European Locks & Picks
The Machine Shop
The Open Source Lock
Handcuffs


Member Spotlight
Member Introductions
Member Lock Collections
Member Social Media


Off Topic
General Chatter
Other Puzzles


Locksmith Business Info
Training & Licensing
Running a Business
Keyways & Key Blanks
Key Machines
Master Keyed Systems
Closers and Crash Bars
Life Safety Compliance
Electronic Locks & Access
Locksmith Supplies
Locksmith Lounge


Buy Sell Trade
Buy - Sell - Trade
It came from Ebay!


Advanced Topics
Membership Information
Special Access Required:
High Security Locks
Vending Locks
Advanced Lock Pick Tools
Bypass Techniques
Safes & Safe Locks
Automotive Entry & Tools
Advanced Buy/Sell/Trade


Locksport Groups
Locksport Local
Chapter President's Office
Locksport Board Room
 

Overly Elaborate Anti-Picking Suggestion

TOSL Project. A community project to "build a better mousetrap".

Re: Overly Elaborate Anti-Picking Suggestion

Postby BbGenesis » 17 Dec 2016 12:45

Sorry to chime in on an old thread, I was around lurking and thought I might have some stuff to add on this one. I like this idea a lot, especially the key insertion idea where the lock waits for key and pin interactions to determine if it's picking or a key. You could do this with a microcontroller fairly easily and, I'm going to make it a little more elaborate here, but it would be more dependant on software vs hardware so it wouldn't really cost or add anything extra to building it. I'm not sure how well I'll be at explaining it but I'm going to try and hopefully ya'll will get it.

For simplicity of the example lets say it's a 5 pin lock pinned 32554. As you insert the key it's going to contact the first pin lifting it up to the incorrect height (4----) then as it hits the second pin the status of the pins will be 54---, then 554--, etc. Hope that makes sense, the pins will be raised to the incorrect height multiple times as you insert the key but the correct key will lift the pins to the same incorrect heights every time in a pattern that won't change. So you can identify the key by what I'll call the insertion signature.

Now this isn't an in depth explanation, just a rough idea. As far as the pins being electronic why not make sleeves in the holes that the pins ride through while the driver pins are an electrically conductive material connected by a wire or something (there's other ways to do this but for simplicity of the explanation lets assume it's a wire. The sleeves the pins are in are also electrically connected. So with all of this you essentially have 5 potentiometers sending a resistance reading back to the mpu. The mpu can read the resistance to know the pin height so that's how it can read the insertion signature. If the pins aren't manipulated in the exact pattern the key would manipulate them in then it locks out the actuator and won't let the lock turn. You could still have the time delay on it as well if you wanted for extra security but I don't think it would be totally necessary.

Idk, I was just reading the posts and it got me to thinking.
BbGenesis
 
Posts: 29
Joined: 27 Jun 2011 13:45

Previous

Return to The Open Source Lock

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests