Having read the FAQ's you are still unfulfilled and seek more enlightenment, so post your general lock picking questions here.
Forum rules
Do not post safe related questions in this sub forum! Post them in This Old Safe
The sub forum you are currently in is for asking Beginner Hobby Lock Picking questions only.
by jimu57 » 11 Jul 2017 21:28
“A determined thief with an angle grinder and enough time can cut through nearly any lock,” says Master Lock's Justin Matuszek. “But more often, the thief has a bolt cutter and is trying to work fast.” He says the thicker a lock's shackle and the less it's exposed, the more secure the lock is from bolt cutters."
Wow! Matuszek must be a genius. At lease a room temperature IQ.
jimu57
"You haven't failed until you stop trying"
-
jimu57
- Supporter

-
- Posts: 526
- Joined: 24 Apr 2015 5:43
- Location: Virginia, USA
by GWiens2001 » 11 Jul 2017 22:28
jimu57 wrote:Wow! Matuszek must be a genius. At lease a room temperature IQ.
That sounds pretty accurate. Of course, it is 72 in this room right now. Gordon
Just when you finally think you have learned it all, that is when you learn that you don't know anything yet.
-

GWiens2001
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 7570
- Joined: 3 Sep 2012 16:24
- Location: Arizona, United States
by Silverado » 12 Jul 2017 7:15
GWiens2001 wrote:jimu57 wrote:<BR abp="907">Wow! Matuszek must be a genius. At lease a room temperature IQ.
<BR abp="908"><BR abp="909">That sounds pretty accurate. <BR abp="910"><BR abp="911">Of course, it is 72 in this room right now.  <BR abp="912"><BR abp="913">Gordon
68 in here! I'll go with that! I agree, I feel like they're doing a lot of 'Puffing' as far as that goes. It had to be a dull bit, or maybe they were trying to drill it with a Phillips head bit driver?
"If you are not currently on a government watch list. You are doing something wrong" - GWiens2001
-

Silverado
- Supporter

-
- Posts: 522
- Joined: 16 Jun 2016 6:59
- Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
by gumptrick » 12 Jul 2017 8:16
billdeserthills wrote:Perhaps they were using a dull drillbit, I understand the legal term is 'Puffing', when the manufacturer lies about their 'fine' product
There's any number of possibilities. Someone could have been using the wrong bit, wrong speed, or was drilling in the wrong place. Plus I'm sure a company the size of Master gets tons of feedback ranging from the worst possible criticism to glowing praise. It's simply a matter of cherry-picking the best praise for their marketing.
-
gumptrick
-
- Posts: 266
- Joined: 8 Jun 2017 8:20
- Location: Texas, USA
by GWiens2001 » 12 Jul 2017 11:14
Amazing how long it takes to drill brass when your drill is set for reverse.  Gordon
Just when you finally think you have learned it all, that is when you learn that you don't know anything yet.
-

GWiens2001
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 7570
- Joined: 3 Sep 2012 16:24
- Location: Arizona, United States
by gumptrick » 12 Jul 2017 12:20
GWiens2001 wrote:Amazing how long it takes to drill brass when your drill is set for reverse.  Gordon
You joke about that, but I actually worked with a guy (who had an engineering degree, no less!) do that exact thing. He ended up being banned from the machine shop at our university because of his consistent and frequent screwups--not only by the shop supervisor (who was tired of him breaking things), but also by our boss, who was tired of paying for his mistakes.
-
gumptrick
-
- Posts: 266
- Joined: 8 Jun 2017 8:20
- Location: Texas, USA
by Ralph_Goodman » 13 Jul 2017 11:16
gumptrick wrote:GWiens2001 wrote:Amazing how long it takes to drill brass when your drill is set for reverse.  Gordon
You joke about that, but I actually worked with a guy (who had an engineering degree, no less!) do that exact thing. He ended up being banned from the machine shop at our university because of his consistent and frequent screwups--not only by the shop supervisor (who was tired of him breaking things), but also by our boss, who was tired of paying for his mistakes.
They are really just giving these degrees away nowadays. Just to clarify, he already had an engineering degree but he was still working in the University Machine shop? Or was he in school at the time getting the degree or additional degree? Also, back to the original topic, I have never known any polygonal shackle to hold up to cutting attacks remarkably better than a rounded shackle. It comes down to the metal in my experience.
-
Ralph_Goodman
-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: 2 Oct 2015 12:25
-
by billdeserthills » 13 Jul 2017 11:37
Ralph_Goodman wrote:gumptrick wrote:GWiens2001 wrote:Amazing how long it takes to drill brass when your drill is set for reverse.  Gordon
You joke about that, but I actually worked with a guy (who had an engineering degree, no less!) do that exact thing. He ended up being banned from the machine shop at our university because of his consistent and frequent screwups--not only by the shop supervisor (who was tired of him breaking things), but also by our boss, who was tired of paying for his mistakes.
They are really just giving these degrees away nowadays. Just to clarify, he already had an engineering degree but he was still working in the University Machine shop? Or was he in school at the time getting the degree or additional degree? Also, back to the original topic, I have never known any polygonal shackle to hold up to cutting attacks remarkably better than a rounded shackle. It comes down to the metal in my experience.
In that case I'm calling shenanigans on the whole Master padlock 'boron shackle' thing at least when Medeco sells a 'boron shackle' padlock, theirs has the same coloration as the #70 proof chain does
-
billdeserthills
-
- Posts: 3837
- Joined: 19 Mar 2014 21:11
- Location: Arizona
by gumptrick » 13 Jul 2017 11:38
Ralph_Goodman wrote:Just to clarify, he already had an engineering degree but he was still working in the University Machine shop? Or was he in school at the time getting the degree or additional degree?
He was a graduate student; he had a batchelor's degree in chemical engineering. He was working on his Masters/Phd in Polymer Science. At the time I was the manager of the polymer lab belonging to the professor he was studying under. Neither of us were employees of the departmental machine shop, but the shop was available for our research use. It was terribly frustrating because he was a really nice guy, very friendly and helpful to anyone. But he was completely incompetent when it came to anything involving tools, machinery, etc. I had a lot of machine shop experience and designed/built a lot of test fixtures for our lab. My boss wanted him to get involved with that so he could learn more, and be able to do some of that work on his own without needing me to do every little thing. But he just kept failing at even the most simple of tasks. Even using a drill press to drill a hole in 2x4 would probably result a broken drill bit, or worse. He actually did more harm than good when trying to "help out". While he was a walking disaster if tools (especially power tools) were involved, surprisingly he didn't damage any of the expensive analytical equipment we had, a lot of which was very fragile. He did eventually end up getting his pHd, and that's honestly scary. Though, the longer I worked there the more it became apparent that graduation had nothing to do with your academic ability. Rather, you were pretty much guaranteed a degree if you put up with the boss's slave-driving for enough time. Basically, the professor in charge published a bunch of research in his name, but 99% of the work was done by the students. He really did work them like slaves. Fortunately that didn't apply to me since I was an employee of the university, not a student. I heard that after he graduated his first employment only lasted 6 months. Also, back to the original topic, I have never known any polygonal shackle to hold up to cutting attacks remarkably better than a rounded shackle. It comes down to the metal in my experience.
That's been my experience too. The amount of metal it adds over the same size circular shackle is trivial. I am 100% sure that it's a marketing angle to make the lock look different and stand out when hanging on the shelf at home depot.
Last edited by gumptrick on 13 Jul 2017 11:53, edited 1 time in total.
-
gumptrick
-
- Posts: 266
- Joined: 8 Jun 2017 8:20
- Location: Texas, USA
by gumptrick » 13 Jul 2017 11:42
billdeserthills wrote:In that case I'm calling shenanigans on the whole Master padlock 'boron shackle' thing at least when Medeco sells a 'boron shackle' padlock, theirs has the same coloration as the #70 proof chain does
That's certainly possible. One thing they may be doing is adding just a little bit of boron to the alloy just so they can use the name, while Medeco uses a higher %, or has a better heat treatment. I don't think the color means much. The gold-ish color on #70 chain isn't from the steel itself, rather it's a plating that's applied afterward. Zinc Chromate. It's purpose is just to prevent the chain from rusting. You see the same thing on a lot of steel hardware/parts. Steel alloyed with boron in its natural state (unplated) will look the same as any other kind of steel would.
-
gumptrick
-
- Posts: 266
- Joined: 8 Jun 2017 8:20
- Location: Texas, USA
by jimu57 » 13 Jul 2017 11:48
Shear strength is shear strength. A round shackle has a greater cross section than hex shapes. Then apply math.
jimu57
"You haven't failed until you stop trying"
-
jimu57
- Supporter

-
- Posts: 526
- Joined: 24 Apr 2015 5:43
- Location: Virginia, USA
by gumptrick » 13 Jul 2017 12:03
jimu57 wrote:Shear strength is shear strength. A round shackle has a greater cross section than hex shapes. Then apply math.
The question of which has more cross-section depends on how you compare them. Are you circumscribing the circle over the octagon? Or are you circumscribing the octagon over the circle?  But in either case the difference in area is minuscule. You could certainly calculate the shear strength difference between the two but it will be negligible because the difference in area is too. Also, I don't think anyone is going to be cutting a shackle in a pure shear setup. They're going to be using a saw, grinder, or bolt cutters. None of which are an example of shear.
-
gumptrick
-
- Posts: 266
- Joined: 8 Jun 2017 8:20
- Location: Texas, USA
by jimu57 » 13 Jul 2017 15:24
If the holes in the body for the shackle is made for a round shackle then the octagonal would be that diameter across the corners, and therefore would have a smaller cross section.
jimu57
"You haven't failed until you stop trying"
-
jimu57
- Supporter

-
- Posts: 526
- Joined: 24 Apr 2015 5:43
- Location: Virginia, USA
by femurat » 14 Jul 2017 0:00
Good point gumptrick. The shackle get machined to fit the hole, so the octagon is bigger than the circle. We are splitting the hair here... Cheers 
-

femurat
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 3755
- Joined: 22 Sep 2008 9:06
- Location: Italy
by 9jack9 » 16 Jul 2017 21:59
So glad this turned into a worthwhile conversation (unlike everything else I've ever posted here  )
-
9jack9
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: 24 Jun 2017 0:59
- Location: USA
Return to Got Questions? - Ask Beginner Hobby Lockpicking Questions Here
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests
|