by Chucklz » 26 Dec 2004 16:46
You can also do alot by eye with a little bit of practice. I down own a set of Schlage depth keys, nor have I ever bothered to use any measuring devices, but I can decode a fair lot of Schlage keys by eye. On the lettered Schlage keyways (C,D,E,EC, etc ) and on many other keyways from many different manufacturers the 0 and 9 (or whatever the deepest cuts are) are quite distinctive. If the key you are trying to decode has either (or both) of these cuts you can make a fair bit of progress. Let me walk you through my mental process for familiar keys, and then unfamiliar keys.
1.) Identify the keyway and manufacturer. This may be alot harder than you think, but generally is fairly easy.
2.) How many pins? If the key is quite worn, this can be hard to determine.
3.) Make a chart, for each pin position and for all cuts. Do this either mentally or on paper. Results are almost always better when done on paper, and I whole heartedly recommend it in the beginning. If there are any cuts that are to the same depth put a star on each column and connect them with a line. Also make note of cuts that are "close" I do this mentally, but you may want to write it down somehow.
4.) Any 0 or 9 cuts? Circle them and your done with those columns. If your not sure, also circle the 1 or 8.
5.) Shallow cut? cross of 7,8,9 maby 6, 5, 4 in the column. Crossing off the 6, 5, 4, you may need some time to learn to judge this.
6.) Repeat the above for deep cuts. Deep cuts are sometimes easier to judge, especially relative to a 9 cut.
7.) Now this is where experience really helps. You need to use the data you have to make judgements about other cuts. For example, if you have a 0, 1, or 8 or 9 cut, depending on the lock, you can generally easily judge a 1, 2, 7, 8 etc. Of course, on some keyways there are features on the key that you can easily map to particular cut.
8.) Make educated guesses abou the other cuts. Generally you can narrow it to 2 or 3 depths.
9.) Measure the remainder if you need to. Or just progress it.
More on this later.