J-Hood wrote:WOT wrote:J-Hood wrote:What happened to Geo and their 45-50mpg cars?? Oh yeah GM bought them out and put the same cars out with a 35mpg engine... hmm.
Jason
A mid 80s Honda CRX HF got 52mpg hwy, but timing and fuel mixture has changed since then for optimal emissions performance. Today's cars don't achieve the maximum mpg technology has to offer. Meeting today's emissions standards is at some expense of mpg.
Sounds like someone needs to do one of those deals like you did above with cost times savings to see if the emissions v/ MPG loss is really putting us in a "greener" place or just putting more green in the wallets of the big oil people. I am pretty sure I know the answer...
I would love to see where the electric cars were going. They put out an electric Ranger so a Econoline could have been down the line...
Jason
Emissions reduction isn't just for overall greenness. While the CO2 and H2O output is directly related to mpg and the CO2 is a green house gas.
The other toxic emissions such as HC, NOx, CO and particles are toxic and/or contributive to smog in areas with dense population. Emissions control system scrubs these quite effectively. This is why the exhaust from a 13mpg is almost odorless while the exhaust from a motorcycle(no emissions control) smells strong.